Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Meta-Anal. Feb 28, 2021; 9(1): 74-87
Published online Feb 28, 2021. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v9.i1.74
Table 3 Quality assessment for efficacy and safety parameters as per the GRADE approach
No. of studies (design)
Limitation
Inconsistency
Indirectness
Imprecision
Publication bias
Quality
RR (95%CI)
Mortality
Four (RCT)No serious limitationsSerious inconsistency (I2 = 59%)No serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionAsymmetric Funnel plotModerate0.83 (0.57-1.20)
Ventilation
Four (RCT)No serious limitationsSerious inconsistency (I2 = 77%)No serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionAsymmetric Funnel plotModerate0.69 (0.41-1.18)
Composite Mortality and ventilation
Four (RCT)No serious limitationsSerious inconsistency (I2 = 78%)No serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionAsymmetric Funnel plotModerate0.80 (0.58-1.11)
Clinical recovery
Three (RCT)No serious limitationsNo serious inconsistencyNo serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionAsymmetric Funnel plotModerate1.10 (1.04-1.16)
Adverse event
Three (RCT)No serious limitationsSerious inconsistency (I2 = 77%)No serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionAsymmetric Funnel plotModerate1.05 (0.86-1.27)
Grade 3 or 4 adverse event
Three (RCT)No serious limitationsNo serious inconsistencyNo serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionAsymmetric Funnel plotModerate0.88 (0.79-0.99)
Serious adverse event
Three (RCT)No serious limitationsNo serious inconsistencyNo serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionAsymmetric Funnel plotModerate0.75 (0.63-0.89)