Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Meta-Anal. Feb 28, 2021; 9(1): 74-87
Published online Feb 28, 2021. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v9.i1.74
Published online Feb 28, 2021. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v9.i1.74
Domain No. | Risk of bias domains | Beigel et al[14] | WHO Solidarity Trial Consortium et al[15] | Spinner et al[20] | Wang et al[21] |
1 | Risk of bias arising from the randomization process | Low | Low | Low | Low |
2a | Risk of bias due to deviations from the intended interventions (effect of assignment to intervention) | Low | Low | Some concern | Low |
2b | Risk of bias due to deviations from the intended interventions (effect of adhering to intervention) | Low | Low | Low | Low |
3 | Missing outcome data | Low | Low | Low | Low |
4 | Risk of bias in measurement of the outcome | Low | Low | Low | Low |
5 | Risk of bias in selection of the reported result | Low | Low | Low | Low |
-- | Overall risk of bias assessment | Low | Low | Some concerns | Low |
- Citation: Patel TK, Patel PB, Barvaliya M, Vijayalaxmi, Bhalla HL. Efficacy and safety outcomes with remdesivir in COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2021; 9(1): 74-87
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v9/i1/74.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v9.i1.74