Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Meta-Anal. Oct 28, 2020; 8(5): 411-434
Published online Oct 28, 2020. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v8.i5.411
Table 1 Characteristics of included studies and participants
Ref.
Country
Research method
Location
Age (yr)
Gender male, %
So et al[49], 2019South KoreaRetrospective studyGastric lesion68.8/68.5954, 79.7%
Kishida et al[45], 2019JapanRetrospective studyColorectal lesion64/6855, 41.66%
Inoue et al[65], 2019JapanProspective observational studyGastrointestinal lesion67.4 ± 8.3201, 58.6%
Harada et al[56], 2019JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion72.3 ± 8.82414, 69.3%
Arimoto et al[54], 2018JapanRetrospective studyColorectal lesion68.5492, 58.3%
Azumi et al[39], 2018JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion73 (41-94)284, 64.8%
Fujita et al[67], 2018JapanRetrospective studyColorectal lesion72.2 ± 7.4/72.9 ± 8.363, 73.8%
Horikawa et al[58], 2018JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion78 (56-89)77, 77%
Izumikawa et al[40], 2018JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion-255, 75.25%
Kono et al[41], 2018JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion72 (66-78)652, 74.77%
Oh et al[60], 2018South KoreaRetrospective studyGastric lesion70 (49-85)173, 80.47%
Park et al[63], 2018South KoreaProspective observationalstudyColorectal lesion55.8 ± 11.9/52.4 ± 12.32661, 68.46%
Sanomura et al[59], 2018JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion69.8 ± 9.2719, 70%
Seo et al[55], 2018South KoreaRetrospective studyColorectal lesion63 (55-69.5)723, 60.8%
Sakai et al[64], 2018JapanRetrospective studyColorectal lesion n72.6 ± 7.2/69.1 ± 10.9669, 66.63%
Yamashita et al[36], 2018JapanRetrospective studyColorectal lesion66.6 ± 10.6373, 57.4%
Yanagisawa et al[35], 2018JapanRetrospective studyGastrointestinal lesion-314, 72.02%
Matsumoto et al[46], 2018JapanRetrospective studyColorectal lesion70/65551, 65.44%
Harada et al[61], 2017JapanProspective observational studyGastric lesion76.8 ± 6.0/72.7 ± 7.940, 88.88%
Yano et al[33], 2017JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion72 (33-94)1319, 74.65%
Ueki et al[14], 2017JapanRetrospective cohort studyGastric lesion71.2 ± 8.4264, 72.5%
Yoshio et al[78], 2017JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion75/7690, 90.91%
Gotoda et al[15], 2017JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion75, 68.8-81.0410, 77.5%
Furuhata et al[17], 2017JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion691377, 77.3%
Shibuya et al[1], 2017JapanRetrospective studyColonic lesion-Unclear
Bronsgeest et al[42], 2017HollandRetrospective studyColorectal lesion67.4 ± 8.3201, 58.6%
Ishigami et al[34], 2017JapanRetrospective studyLower gastrointestinal lesion64.9 ± 11.1526, 68%
Pigò et al[3], 2017ItalyRetrospective studyColorectal lesion65.4385, 63.2%
Kono et al[76], 2017JapanProspective observationalstudyUpper gastrointestinal lesion74 ± 8.344, 89.8%
Lin et al[75], 2017United StatesRetrospective studyColorectal lesion-Unclear
Sato et al[38], 2017JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion71.11786, 75.1%
Igarashi et al[27], 2017JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion72.4758, 77.7%
Amato et al[31], 2016ItalyProspective observational studyGastrointestinal lesion59 ± 12.154.3%
Kubo et al[32], 2016JapanRetrospective studyGastrointestinal lesion63.9467,59.3%
Shindo et al[25], 2016JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion71 ± 8, 32-87190, 72.5%
Yoshida et al[52], 2016JapanRetrospective studyColorectal lesion68.2 ± 10.3Unclear
Ninomiya et al[53], 2015JapanRetrospective studyColorectal lesion67 ± 11.1410, 70.4%
Al-Mammari et al[4], 2015United KingdomProspective observational studyOesophageal lesion71, 65-7885, 72.6%
Odagiri et al[16], 2015JapanRetrospective cohort studyColorectal lesion-4495, 59.4%
Namasivayam et al[5], 2014United StatesRetrospective studyGastrointestinal lesion69Unclear
Terasaki et al[21], 2014JapanRetrospective studyColorectal lesion66.9 ± 11.2233, 64.2%
Tounou et al[50], 2014JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion71.8, 36-92257, 73.4%
Suzuki et al[18], 2014JapanRetrospective studyColorectal lesion65.5, 29-86183, 57.7%
Matsumura et al[23], 2014JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion72.1 ± 8.6302, 71.1%
Beppu et al[74], 2014JapanRetrospective studyColorectal lesion59.5 ± 11.6176, 84.6%
Inoue et al[77], 2014JapanRetrospective studyColorectal lesion69.295, 81.2%
Sanomura et al[66], 2014JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion73.7 ± 8.964, 82.1%
Yoshio et al[47], 2013JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion70951, 76.1%
Takeuchi et al[29], 2013JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion5.2477, 57.2%
Koh et al[37], 2013JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion70.3 ± 8.6817, 74%
Mukai et al[6], 2012JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion72.4 ± 8.8116, 72%
Lim et al[51], 2012South KoreaRetrospective studyGastric lesion62.61143, 71.8%
Miyahara et al[48], 2012JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion71.7 ± 8.9, 36-92763, 70.5%
Cho et al[57], 2012South KoreaRetrospective studyColorectal lesion62.2385, 74.9%
Toyokawa T et al[24], 2011JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion26-95811, 72.2%
Higashiyama et al[19], 2011JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion69, 29-91702, 76%
Metz et al[2], 2011AustraliaProspective observational studyColonic lesion68, 26-93Unclear
Tokioka et al[30], 2011JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion69.4378, 73.4%
Okada K et al[22], 2011JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion68.4, 33-94425, 73%
Mannen et al[20], 2010JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion71.6 ± 8.6, 36-91323, 74.1%
Goto et al[13], 2010JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion68.3347, 76.4%
Witt et al[44], 2009United StatesRetrospective cohort studyColorectal lesion69.6691, 56.4%
Ono et al[28], 2019JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion67Unclear
Takizawa et al[26], 2008JapanRetrospective studyGastric lesion66 ± 10, 29-93779, 80.5%
Sawhney et al[62], 2007United StatesRetrospective studyColorectal lesion65.1169, 97.7%
Yousfi et al[43], 2004United StatesRetrospective studyGastrointestinal lesion70.5, 45-91100, 61.7%