Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Meta-Anal. Jun 28, 2020; 8(3): 190-209
Published online Jun 28, 2020. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v8.i3.190
Table 3 Summary of active clinical trials evaluating checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy
TherapyComparatorTherapy indicationPhaseEstimated study durationEstimated patient enrollmentPrimary endpointsTrial identifier
Nivolumab plus ipilimumabNoneNeoadjuvantI/IIMarch 1, 2019-September 1, 202232Delay to surgery, incidence of treatment-related adverse eventsNCT03682276 (PRIME-HCC)
Nivolumab plus ipilimumabNivolumab vs nivolumab plus ipilimumab (regimen 1) vs nivolumab plus ipilimumab (regimen 2)NeoadjuvantIISeptember 28, 2017-September 30, 202245Incidence of adverse eventsNCT03222076
Nivolumab plus ipilimumabNoneNeoadjuvantIIJune 1, 2018-December 31, 202240Percentage of subjects with tumor shrinkage after therapyNCT03510871
Nivolumab and ipilimumab plus INCAGN01876 (OX-40 Agonist)Nivolumab plus INCAGN01876 vs ipilimumab plus INCAGN01876Not specifiedI/IIApril 13, 2017-October 28, 2021285Safety and tolerability, ORRNCT03126110
Nivolumab plus ipilimumabSorafenib or lenvatinibFirst-lineIIISeptember 16, 2019 – September 16, 20231084OSNCT04039607 (CheckMate 9DW)
Durvalumab plus tremelimumabDurvalumab vs tremelimumab vs durvalumab plus tremelimumab (regimen 1) vs durvalumab plus tremelimumab (regimen 2) vs durvalumab plus bevacizumabSecond-line (first-line for patients receiving durvalumab plus bevacizumab)IIOctober 19, 2015-January 6, 2021433Number patients experiencing adverse events and dose-limiting toxicitiesNCT02519348
Durvalumab plus tremelimumabDurvalumab vs durvalumab plus tremelimumab (regimen 1) vs durvalumab plus tremelimumab (regimen 2) vs sorafenibFirst-lineIIIOctober 11, 2017-October 30, 20201310OSNCT03298451 (HIMALAYA)