Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Meta-Anal. Jun 28, 2020; 8(3): 190-209
Published online Jun 28, 2020. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v8.i3.190
Table 2 Reported results of successful clinical trials evaluating immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients
TherapyComparatorTherapy indicationPhaseApproximate data collection periodPatients enrolledPrimary endpointsTrial identifier
NivolumabNoneNot specifiedI/IINovember 26, 2012-August 8, 2016214 (dose-escalation), 48 (dose-expansion)ORR (dose-escalation phase - 15%), (dose-expansion phase – 20%)NCT01658878 (CheckMate 040)
PembrolizumabNoneSecond-lineIIJune 22, 2016- February 20, 2017104ORR – 18.3%, median OS 13.2 moNCT02702414 (KEYNOTE-224)
CamrelizumabCamrelizumab (regimen 1) vs camrelizumab (regimen 2)Second-lineIINovember 15, 2016– November 16, 2017220ORR 13.8%, median OS not reachedNCT02989922
DurvalumabNoneNot specifiedI/IIAugust 29, 2012-October 24, 201640ORR – 10.3%, median OS 13.2 moNCT01693562
TremelimumabNoneNot specifiedIIDecember 2008-May 201221ORR - 17.6%, DCR 76.4%NCT01008358
PembrolizumabPlaceboSecond-lineIIIMay 31, 2016-November 23, 2017413Median OS 13.9 vs 10.6 months – HR: 0.781; 95%CI: 0.611 to 0.998; P = 0.0238, PFS 3.0 vs 2.8 months – HR: 0.718; 95%CI, 0.570 to 0.904; P = 0.0022 (pembrolizumab vs placebo)NCT02702401
Nivolumab plus ipilimumabNivolumab plus ipilimumab (regimen 1 vs regimen 2 vs regimen 3)Second-lineI/IIMinimum follow-up-28 months at time of data cutoff148ORR – (32 - Arm A, 31- Arm B, 31 - Arm C), median DOR (17.5 - Arm A, 22.2 - Arm B, 16.6 - Arm C )NCT01658878 (CheckMate 040)
Durvalumab plus tremelimumabNoneSecond-lineI/IIOctober 19, 2015-January 10, 201740ORR – 15%NCT02519348
Atezolizumab plus bevacizumabSorafenibFirst-lineIIIMarch 15, 2018-November 2019501OS HR: 0.58 (95%CI: 0.42- 0.79; P = 0.0006), PFS 6.8 vs 4.3 mo, P < 0.0001 (atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs sorafenib)NCT03434379(IMbrave 150)