Systematic Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Meta-Anal. May 31, 2019; 7(5): 234-248
Published online May 31, 2019. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v7.i5.234
Table 7 Minimum residual liver volume based on various functional assessments
AuthorsPublicationsFunctional assessmentsMinimum residual LV
Mortality
NLCH, liver injuryLC
Shirabe et al[49]J Am Coll Surg, 1999Pathology (HCC, HB, or HC)250 mL/m2 (40%)8.8% (180 d)
Shoup et al[50]J Gastrointest Surg, 2003Pathology (NL, CRC metastasis alone)25%--ND
Schindl et al[51]Gut, 2005Pathology (NL, 99% metastasis)26.6%--ND
Ferrero et al[17]World J Surg, 2007Pathology (NL, liver injury)26.5%31%-0.8% (60 d)
van den Esschert et al[52]J Gastrointest Surg, 2009Pathology (CH, LC)-40%50%ND
Kishi et al[53]Ann Surg, 2009Pathology (NL)20%--2.0% (30 d) 4.7% (60 d) 6.0% (90 d)
Suda et al[54]Am J Surg, 2009Pathology (NL, HCCa, GBCa, ICCa)40%--8.1% (ND)
Vauthey et al[55]HPB, 2010Pathology (NL, liver injury, LC)20%30%40%ND
Gulielmi et al[56]Dig Surg, 2012Pathology (NL, steatosis, LC)20%30%40%ND
Hwang et al[16]J Gastrointest Surg, 2015Pathology (CH, LC)-35%30%0.8% (90 d)
Ribero et al[57]J Am Coll Surg, 2016Pathology (NL, HCCa alone)30%--11% (90 d)
Our seriesHepatogastroenterolo-gy (in press)ATIII, ICG15, GSA35%-95%2.3% (90 d)