Systematic Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Meta-Anal. May 31, 2019; 7(5): 234-248
Published online May 31, 2019. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v7.i5.234
Table 6 Characteristics of the patients and simple standard liver volume formulae based on a mean body surface area of 1.61
AuthorsMean age ± SD (range)BSASimple formulae (tentative mean BSA = 1.61)ICCClusters
DeLand et al[29]NDNDLV = 883 × BSA0.75B
Urata et al[30]11.1 ± 8.81.078 ± 0.528 (0.248–1.935)LV = 707 × BSA0.71A
Murry et al[31]9.7 (3.3–18.8)Median: 1.37 (0.57–2.0)LV = 710 × BSA0.71A
Heinemann et al[32]50.6±18.9NDLV = 858 × BSA0.75B
Vauthey et al[33]Mean: 54, Median: 56 (14-90)Median: 1.82 (1.32–2.90)LV = 770 × BSA0.74B
Yoshizumi et al[34]38.6 ± 20.6 (0–87) for males; 47.0 ± 19.7 (0–85) for females1.86 ± 0.36 (0.24-2.88); 1.68 ± 0.28 (0.28-2.38)LV = 772 × BSA0.74B
Yu et al[24]42.4 ± 16.51.65 ± 0.26LV = 831 × BSA0.74B
Hashimoto et al[35](17-66)1.67 ± 0.18 (1.25-2.56)LV = 710 × BSA0.71A
Chandramohan et al[25]46.5 (10-70)Median: 1.60 (0.88-2.25)LV = 774 × BSA0.73B
Saeki et al[36]5.8 (0 d-15)NDLV = 675 × BSA0.70A
Our study67.0 ± 10.31.61 ± 0.18LV = 709 × BSA0.71A