Systematic Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Meta-Anal. May 31, 2019; 7(5): 234-248
Published online May 31, 2019. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v7.i5.234
Table 5 Formulae for the calculation of standard liver volume based on age, gender, or radiological findings
AuthorsJournalsFormulaeICC
OthersTakahashi et al[37]Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2000LV = 15 × (4.6 × Age + 19.8), Age: 1-18; LV = 15 × (0.31 × Age + 97.8), Age: 30-40; LV = 15 × (–0.91 × Age + 149), Age: ≥ 410.39
Kanamori et al[38]Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2002LV = 67.3 × Age + 229.8−0.39
Choukèr et al[39]Liver Transpl, 2004LV=452 + 16.34 × BW + 11.85 × Age – 166 × Gender (Age: 16–50, M: 0, F: 1); LV=1390 + 15.94 × BW – 12.86 × Age (Age: 51–70)0.79
Chan et al[40]World J Gastroenterol, 2006LV = 218 + BW × 12.3 + Gender × 51 (F: 0, M: 1)0.74
Yuan et al[41]Transplant Proc, 2008LV = 949.7 × BSA − 48.3 × Age − 247.4 (Age: 1: < 40, 2: 41–60, 3: > 60)0.77
Kokudo et al[42]J Hepatol, 2015LV = 203.3 − 3.61 × Age + 58.7 × Thoracic width − 463.7 × Race (Asian: 1, Caucasian: 0)0.66
Ma et al[43]Liver Transpl, 2017LV = (2 × Depth) + (10 × BW) + 1900.75