Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Meta-Anal. Feb 22, 2019; 7(2): 31-50
Published online Feb 22, 2019. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v7.i2.31
Table 4 For each factor, the significance of the differences in rates between the factor levels: Cut 1, univariate analyses
RateBody fluidAssay methodStudy typeAge groupAware validatedTime publishedStudy qualityPregnancyTobacco productsSexLocationSex × location
M1% of self-reported non-smokers whose cotinine implies current smokingNSNSc1NSNSNSNSNSNSNSNSNS
M2% of self-reported never smokers whose cotinine implies current smokingNSNSNSbNSNSaNSd1NSbd
M3% of self-reported ex-smokers whose cotinine implies current smokingabd1dcaNSda1acb
M4% of self-reported current smokers whose cotinine implies non-smokingNSbd1d1NSd1NS1NSNSNSNSNS
M5% of true current smokers who report being non-smokersNSNSbNSNSd1NSNSNSNSNSc1
M6% of true current smokers who report being never smokersNSNSNSNSNSNSNSNSNSbNSd1
M7% of true current smokers who report being ex-smokersNSNSd1cNSbNSaNSNSNSNS
M8% of self-reported current smokers (plus misclassified non-smokers) who report being non-smokersNSNSNSabd1aNSbNSNSd1
M9% of self-reported current smokers (plus misclassified non-smokers) who report being never smokersaNSNSNSNSNS1NSNSNSbNSd1
M10% of self-reported current smokers (plus misclassified non-smokers) who report being ex-smokersNSNSd1cNSbNSbNSbNSNS
M11% of true non-smokers who report being current smokersbNSd1d1NSNSNSNSNSNSaNS