Synthetic vs biologic mesh for the repair and prevention of parastomal hernia

doi:10.13105/wjma.v5.i6.150

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 5, Issue 6

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (10619)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-6) series, Tables (1-6) series.

Item

Count

PDF

503

WORD

350

HTML

7424

Figures (1-6)

286

Tables (1-6)

269

Sum=8832

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

800

Download

987

Sum=1787

Dec 26, 2017 (publication date) through Dec 4, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (2)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Meta-Analysis

ISSN

2308-3840

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Systematic Reviews

World J Meta-Anal. Dec 26, 2017; 5(6): 150-166
Published online Dec 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i6.150

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for risk of bias included in the systematic review. The absolute numbers of the studies are shown in boxes.

Citation: Knaapen L, Buyne O, van Goor H, Slater NJ. Synthetic vs biologic mesh for the repair and prevention of parastomal hernia. World J Meta-Anal 2017; 5(6): 150-166
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v5/i6/150.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v5.i6.150