Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Meta-Anal. Dec 26, 2017; 5(6): 150-166
Published online Dec 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i6.150
Published online Dec 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i6.150
Figure 2 Incidence of parastomal hernia after prophylactic mesh placement vs no mesh placement.
A: Random sequence generation (selection bias); B: Allocation concealment (selection bias); C: Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias); D: Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias); E: Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias); F: Selective reporting (reporting bias); G: Other bias.
- Citation: Knaapen L, Buyne O, van Goor H, Slater NJ. Synthetic vs biologic mesh for the repair and prevention of parastomal hernia. World J Meta-Anal 2017; 5(6): 150-166
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v5/i6/150.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v5.i6.150