Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Meta-Anal. Dec 26, 2017; 5(6): 150-166
Published online Dec 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i6.150
Published online Dec 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i6.150
Hernia repair | No. of studies | No. of mesh repairs | Recurrence | Complications | ||
Wound infection | Mesh infection | Other | ||||
Open repair | 9 | 213 | 13.5% (8.1-20.2) | 3% (1.2-5.7) FE | 2.3% (0.7-4.8) FE | 12.8% (7.4-19.4) |
Laparoscopic repair | 10 | 397 | 18% (8.9-29.5) | 2.4% (0.804.8) FE | 3.6% (1.9-5.7) FE | 23.8% (14.5-34.6) |
P value | 0.37 | 0.79 | 0.5 | ≤ 0.0001 |
- Citation: Knaapen L, Buyne O, van Goor H, Slater NJ. Synthetic vs biologic mesh for the repair and prevention of parastomal hernia. World J Meta-Anal 2017; 5(6): 150-166
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v5/i6/150.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v5.i6.150