Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Meta-Anal. Dec 26, 2017; 5(6): 150-166
Published online Dec 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i6.150
Published online Dec 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i6.150
Hernia repair | No of studies | No of mesh repairs | Recurrence | Complications | ||
Wound infection | Mesh infection | Other | ||||
Biologic mesh | 5 | 84 | 24% (8.6-44.1) | 5.6% (1.4-12.1) | 0% (0-5.4) FE | 13.4% (1.9-32.7) |
Synthetic mesh | 21 | 669 | 15.1% (9.7-21.6) | 2.8% (1.6-4.4) | 3.1% (1.8-4.6) FE | 17.8% (12.0-24.4) |
P value | 0.01 | 0.32 | 0.39 | 0.15 |
- Citation: Knaapen L, Buyne O, van Goor H, Slater NJ. Synthetic vs biologic mesh for the repair and prevention of parastomal hernia. World J Meta-Anal 2017; 5(6): 150-166
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v5/i6/150.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v5.i6.150