Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Meta-Anal. Aug 26, 2017; 5(4): 85-102
Published online Aug 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i4.85
Published online Aug 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i4.85
Ref. | Year | Drug | Entry criteria | Primary endpoint | Secondary endpoint | Remission/clinical improvement | Length of study |
Randomised clinical trials - to induce remission | |||||||
Mesalazine (5-ASA) | |||||||
Marteau etal[58] | 2005 | Pentasa (PR + PO vs PO alone) | UCDAI: 3-8 | Remission at week 4 | Remission rate at week 8 Improvement at week 4 and 8 | Remission: UCDAI ≤ 1 Clinical improvement: A decrease of UCDAI ≥ 2 | 8 wk |
D’Haens etal[59] | 2006 | SPD476 - MMX mesalazine | UCDAI: 4-10 + endoscopic score ≥1 PGA score ≤ 2 | Remission | Change in UCDAI, FS, histology at week 8 Change in symptoms | Remission: UCDAI ≤ 1 (with RB 0, SF ≤ 1 ) at week 8 | 8 wk |
Sandborn etal[60] | 2007 | MMX Multi Matrix System mesalazine | UCDAI: 4-10 + endoscopic score ≥1 PGA score ≤ 2 | Clinical/endoscopic remission at 8 wk | Proportion of clinical improvement Proportion of patients as treatment failure Change in: RB, SF, FS | Clinical remission: UCDAI ≤ 1 Endoscopic remission: UCDAI endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 Clinical improvement: A decrease of UCDAI ≥ 3 Treatment failure: Unchanged or worsened UCDAI | 8 wk |
Lichtenstein et al[61] | 2007 | SPD476 - MMX mesalazine OD vs BD | UCDAI: 4-10 | Clinical and endoscopic remission at week 8 | Comparison of remission rate at week 8 | Clinical remission: UCDAI ≤ 1 with RB/SF/EI = 0 | 8 wk |
Kamm et al[62,63] MEZAVANT study | 2007 2009 | MEZAVANT MMX Mesalamine | Mild - mod UC: UCDAI 4-10 + endoscopic subscore ≥ 1, PGA ≤ 2 | Clinical + Endoscopic remission at week 8 | Clinical remission Clinical improvement Change in UCDAI | Clinical + endoscopic remission: UCDAI ≤ 1 + subscore RB/SF = 0, No mucosal friability + a ≥ 1 reduction in EI Clinical improvement: Decrease in UCDAI ≥ 3 | 8 wk |
Ito et al[64] | 2010 | Asacol vs PentasaTime-dependent vs pH dependent Mesalamine | UCDAI: 3-8 and blood stool score ≥ 1 | To demonstrate Asacol over Pentasa AND the decrease in UCDAI | Macroscopic changes | Remission: UCDAI ≤ 2 and no blood diarrhoea Clinical improvement: UCDAI decreased by ≥ 2 | 8 wk |
Hiwatashi etal[65] | 2010 | Mesalazine - dose study | UCDAI: 6-8 | Change in UCDAI at week 8 | Remission, improvement, efficacy | Remission: UCDAI ≤ 1 Efficacy: Decrease of UCDAI ≥ 2 | 8 wk |
Flourié et al[66] MOTUS study | 2013 | Mesalazine, Pentasa OD or BD in total of 4 g/d | UCDAI: 3-8 | UCDAI ≤ 1 after 8 wk | Complete remission (UCDAI = 0) at 8 wk UCDAI decreased by ≥ 2 at 8 wk Clinical remission at week 4, 8, 12 Mucosal healing at 8 wk | Complete remission: UCDAI = 0 Endoscopic remission: UCDAI endoscopic subscore: 0 or 1 Clinical remission: UCDAI ≤ 1 | 12 wk |
Probert et al[42] PINCE study | 2013 | Mesalazine (pentasa) enema | UCDAI: 3-8 | Remission rate (UCDAI < 2) at 4 wk | Remission rate at 8 wk, improvement at week 2, 4 and 8 Time to cessation of RB QoL (EQ-5D) | Remission: UCDAI ≤ 1 Clinical improvement: UCDAI decreased by ≥ 2 | 8 wk |
Sun et al[67] | 2016 | Mesalazine (modified-release vs enteric-coated tablets) | UCDAI: 3-8 + bloody stool score > 1 | The decrease in UCDAI | Remission rate Efficacy rate | Remission: UCDAI ≤ 2 + bloody stool 0 Clinical improvement: A decrease of UCDAI ≥ 2 | 8 wk |
Suzuki etal[68] | 2016 | pH dependent release mesalamine, asacol dose | UCDAI: 6 - 10 Rectal bleeding score ≥ 1 | Decrease in UCDAI | Remission: UCDAI ≤ 2 Rectal bleeding score: 0 Improvement UCDAI decreased by ≥ 2 | 8 wk | |
Thiazole compounds | |||||||
Mantzaris etal[69] | 2004 | Azathioprine alone (2.2 mg/kg) vs combination with olsalazine (0.5 g TID) | Steroid-dependent remission | Relapse rate | Time to relapse Time to discontinuation Severity of relapse | Remission: UCDAI ≤ 1 Relapse: New symptoms + UCDAI > 3 | 2 yr |
Schreiber etal[70] | 2007 | Tetomilast - Thiazole compound | UCDAI: 4-11 | Clinical improvement: UCDAI decreased by ≥ 3 at 8 wk | Remission Clinical improvement at week 4 IBDQ-32 score Proportion of pts with improved Flexible Sigmoidscopy score Time to clinical improvement Time to remission | Clinical improvement: UCDAI decreased by ≥ 3 Remission: UCDAI ≤ 1 | 8 wk |
Steroids | |||||||
Travis et al[71] CORE II study | 2012 | Budesonide MMX | UCDAI: 4-10 | Clinical/endoscopic remission at week 8 | Clinical improvement Endoscopic improvement at week 8 | Clinical/endoscopic Remission: UCDAI ≤ 1 + RB/SF/EI = 0 Clinical improvement: A decrease of UCDAI ≥ 3 Endoscopic improvement: A decrease of EI ≥ 1 | 8 wk |
Probiotics | |||||||
Vernia etal[72] | 2000 | Sodium Butyrate | Mild-moderate UC | Remission or marked improvement | Remission: UCDAI ≤ 2 Positive response: Decrease of UCDAI ≥ 2 | 6 wk | |
Mahmood etal[73] | 2005 | Human recombinant trefoil factor 3 enema | UCDAI: >3 | Remission at week 2 | Clinical significant improvement in clinical and histological scores at 2 and 4 wk | Remission: UCDAI ≤ 1 without RB Clinical improvement: A decrease of UCDAI >3 | 4 wk |
Lichtenstein et al[74] | 2007 | Bowman-Birk inhibitor concentrate - soy extract with high protease inhibitor activity | UCDAI: 4-10 | Remission at week 8 | Remission: UCDAI ≤ 1 + no RB or SF Clinical improvement: UCDAI decrease ≥ 1 | ||
Tursi et al[75] | 2009 | VSL #3 (probiotic) | UCDAI 3-8, endoscopic subscore ≥ 3 | Decrease in UCDAI of ≥ 50% | Activity of relapsing UC Remission Improvement Change in objective and subjective symptoms | Remission: UCDAI ≤ 2 | 8 wk |
Sood et al[76] | 2009 | VSL #3 probiotic | UCDAI 3-9 with endoscopic subscore ≥ 2 | Clinical improvement at week 6 | Clinical remission | Clinical remission: UCDAI ≤ 2 Clinical improvement: A decrease UCDAI by 50% | 12 wk |
Tamaki etal[77] | 2016 | Bifidobacterium longum 536 (probiotic) | UCDAI 3-9 | Change in UCDAI | Remission Improvement of Objective and subjective symptoms Endoscopic improvement in Mayo subscore | Remission: UCDAI ≤ 2 | 8 wk |
Helminth therapy Garg etal[78] | 2014 | Helminth Trichuris suis ova | UCDAI of ≥ 4 | Clinical improvement | Clinical remission | Clinical improvement: Decrease in the UCDAI of ≥ 4 Clinical remission: UCDAI of ≤ 2 | 12 wk |
Nicotine therapy | |||||||
Ingram etal[79] | 2005 | Nicotine enema 6 mg/d | Confirmed UC with inflamed mucosa grade > 2 | Clinical remission | Improvement in the UCDAI | Clinical remission: UCDAI EI ≤ 1 and No RB for 1 wk | 6 wk |
Randomised clinical trials - to maintain remission | |||||||
Lichtenstein et al[80-82] and Zakko etal[83] | 2010 2012 2015 2016 | Mesalamine granules 1.5 g/d, OD | Previously achieved remission with steroids for > 1 mo and < 12 mo | Percentage of patients relapse-free at 6 mo | Mean changes from baseline at month 6 | Relapse: UCDAI RB ≥ 1 and EI ≥ 2 Remission: UCDAI RB = 0, EI < 2 | 6 mo |
Bokemeyer et al[43] and Dignass etal[84] | 2009 2011 | Mesalazine, Pentasa OD or BD in total of 2 g/d | Clinical remission: UCDAI < 2 | To demonstrate OD is not inferior to BD | Time to relapse between 2 groups UC-DAI total and subscores between 2 groups | Remain in remission UCDAI ≤ 2 | 12 mo |
- Citation: Jitsumura M, Kokelaar RF, Harris DA. Remission endpoints in ulcerative colitis: A systematic review. World J Meta-Anal 2017; 5(4): 85-102
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v5/i4/85.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v5.i4.85