Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Meta-Anal. Aug 26, 2017; 5(4): 85-102
Published online Aug 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i4.85
Published online Aug 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i4.85
Ref. | Year | Type of study | Drug/subject of study | Entry criteria | Primary endpoint | Secondary endpoint | Remission/clinical improvement | Length of study |
Hartman et al[54] | 2016 | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study | AVX-470, oral | 36 patients with Mayo score 5-12 and Mayo ES ≥ 2 | Not set, but implies clinical response at week 4 | Not set | Remission was not defined. Clinical response Mayo reduction ≥ 3 | 4 wk |
Lin et al[55] | 2015 | Prospective, multi-centre study | Faecal calprotectin | 52 patients with UC | N/A | N/A | Endoscopic remission: UCEIS < 3 | N/A |
Magro et al[56] ACERTIVE study | 2016 | Cross-sectional multi-centre study | Faecal calprotectin/ lipocalin | 371 patients Mayo partial score < 2, montreal classification < 2 | Remission: UCEIS ≤ 1 Mucosal healing: Mayo ES = 0 |
- Citation: Jitsumura M, Kokelaar RF, Harris DA. Remission endpoints in ulcerative colitis: A systematic review. World J Meta-Anal 2017; 5(4): 85-102
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v5/i4/85.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v5.i4.85