Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Meta-Anal. Aug 26, 2017; 5(4): 103-123
Published online Aug 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i4.103
Table 1 Rates of medication non-adherence in bipolar disorder: Reviews
Ref.Review based onNon-adherence rates
Van Putten[20], 19757 studies20%-30% (only lithium)
Jamison and Akiskal[21], 198310 studies33%-50% (only lithium)
Cochran[5], 198613 studies from 1966-19869%-57% (only lithium)
Goodwin and Jamison[22], 199050 studies18%-53% (only lithium)
Lingam and Scott[6], 20023 studies and 1 review20%-66%, median 41%
Perlick et al[7], 200425 papers from 1979-200423%-68%, median 42%
Colom et al[4], 20056 studies20%-64%, mean 25%
Gaudiano et al[18], 20083 reviews20%-60%, mean 40%
Basco and Smith[8], 20099 studies8%-64%
Busby and Sajatovic[3], 20106 studies20%-60%
Foster et al[23], 20117 studies21%-50%
Leclerc et al[12], 201327 studies(rates derived from 6 studies)12%-64%
García et al[16], 20169 studies23%-60% (only antipsychotics)