Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Meta-Anal. Aug 26, 2017; 5(4): 103-123
Published online Aug 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i4.103
Published online Aug 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i4.103
Ref. | Review based on | Non-adherence rates |
Van Putten[20], 1975 | 7 studies | 20%-30% (only lithium) |
Jamison and Akiskal[21], 1983 | 10 studies | 33%-50% (only lithium) |
Cochran[5], 1986 | 13 studies from 1966-1986 | 9%-57% (only lithium) |
Goodwin and Jamison[22], 1990 | 50 studies | 18%-53% (only lithium) |
Lingam and Scott[6], 2002 | 3 studies and 1 review | 20%-66%, median 41% |
Perlick et al[7], 2004 | 25 papers from 1979-2004 | 23%-68%, median 42% |
Colom et al[4], 2005 | 6 studies | 20%-64%, mean 25% |
Gaudiano et al[18], 2008 | 3 reviews | 20%-60%, mean 40% |
Basco and Smith[8], 2009 | 9 studies | 8%-64% |
Busby and Sajatovic[3], 2010 | 6 studies | 20%-60% |
Foster et al[23], 2011 | 7 studies | 21%-50% |
Leclerc et al[12], 2013 | 27 studies(rates derived from 6 studies) | 12%-64% |
García et al[16], 2016 | 9 studies | 23%-60% (only antipsychotics) |
- Citation: Chakrabarti S. Medication non-adherence in bipolar disorder: Review of rates, demographic and clinical predictors. World J Meta-Anal 2017; 5(4): 103-123
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v5/i4/103.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v5.i4.103