Antibiotics for eradicating meningococcal carriages: Network meta-analysis and investigation of evidence inconsistency

doi:10.13105/wjma.v4.i4.77

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 4, Issue 4

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (10486)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-6) series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

435

WORD

278

HTML

4802

Figures (1-6)

162

Tables (1-5)

223

Sum=5900

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

723

Download

1391

Sum=2114

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

937

Download

1535

Sum=2472

Aug 26, 2016 (publication date) through Jul 3, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (1)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Meta-Analysis

ISSN

2308-3840

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Meta-Anal. Aug 26, 2016; 4(4): 77-87
Published online Aug 26, 2016. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v4.i4.77

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 4 Rifampin vs ciprofloxacin for preventing meningococcal infections. The outcome is the failure to eradicate at 1 wk. Pooled direct and indirect estimates were the results of mixed treatment comparison, and other results were from DerSimonian-Laird meta-analyses.

Citation: Abdelhamid AS, Loke YK, Abubakar I, Song F. Antibiotics for eradicating meningococcal carriages: Network meta-analysis and investigation of evidence inconsistency. World J Meta-Anal 2016; 4(4): 77-87
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v4/i4/77.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v4.i4.77