Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Meta-Anal. Jun 26, 2016; 4(3): 69-76
Published online Jun 26, 2016. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v4.i3.69
Published online Jun 26, 2016. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v4.i3.69
Ref. | Adequate sequence generation | Adequate allocation concealment | Blinding | Incomplete outcome data addressed | Free of selective reporting |
Axcrona et al[14] | Unclear | Unclear | High risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Anderson et al[15] | Unclear | Unclear | High risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Mason et al[16] | Unclear | Unclear | High risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Klotz et al[11] | Validated computer program | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Ozono et al[10] | Central allocation | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Van Poppel et al[12] | Unclear | Unclear | High risk | Low risk | Low risk |
- Citation: Fang C, Wu CL, Liu SS, Ge L, Bai JL. Efficacy, safety, and dose comparison of degarelix for the treatment of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2016; 4(3): 69-76
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v4/i3/69.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v4.i3.69