Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Meta-Anal. Apr 26, 2016; 4(2): 10-43
Published online Apr 26, 2016. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v4.i2.10
Published online Apr 26, 2016. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v4.i2.10
Estimates considered | No. of estimates | Relative risk (95% confidence limits) | Heterogeneity1 | |
Fixed-effects meta-analysis | Random-effects meta-analysis | |||
All | 119 | 1.18 (1.14-1.23) | 1.21 (1.14-1.29) | +++ |
N America | 38 | 1.08 (1.00-1.17) | 1.09 (0.95-1.26) | +++ |
Europe | 22 | 1.15 (1.03-1.28) | 1.16 (1.00-1.35) | (+) |
Asia | 54 | 1.24 (1.17-1.32) | 1.31 (1.20-1.44) | +++ |
Asia - Japan | 13 | 1.26 (1.11-1.45) | 1.26 (1.11-1.45) | NS |
Asia - Hong Kong | 8 | 1.32 (1.12-1.57) | 1.31 (1.06-1.63) | NS |
Asia - China | 23 | 1.16 (1.06-1.27) | 1.29 (1.08-1.54) | +++ |
Asia - Other | 10 | 1.34 (1.19-1.51) | 1.37 (1.19-1.57) | NS |
Heterogeneity between Asian countries | NS | |||
Other continents | 5 | 1.20 (1.09-1.33) | 1.20 (1.09-1.33) | NS |
Heterogeneity between continents | (+) | |||
Published in 1981-1989 | 34 | 1.38 (1.24-1.54) | 1.38 (1.24-1.54) | NS |
Published in 1990-1999 | 33 | 1.09 (1.01-1.17) | 1.15 (1.02-1.28) | ++ |
Published in 2000-2009 | 34 | 1.22 (1.12-1.33) | 1.21 (1.08-1.36) | + |
Published in 2010 onwards | 18 | 1.17 (1.10-1.26) | 1.13 (0.94-1.36) | +++ |
Heterogeneity by publication date | ++ | |||
1-49 cases | 23 | 1.44 (1.14-1.81) | 1.47 (1.15-1.88) | NS |
50-99 | 31 | 1.30 (1.14-1.47) | 1.27 (1.08-1.50) | + |
100-199 | 29 | 1.09 (1.00-1.19) | 1.10 (0.96-1.26) | +++ |
200-399 | 22 | 1.33 (1.21-1.46) | 1.32 (1.16-1.50) | + |
400+ | 14 | 1.14 (1.07-1.20) | 1.13 (1.02-1.25) | ++ |
Heterogeneity by study size | ++ | |||
Case-control | 97 | 1.18 (1.13-1.23) | 1.22 (1.13-1.31) | +++ |
Prospective | 22 | 1.18 (1.05-1.33) | 1.18 (1.05-1.33) | NS |
Heterogeneity by study type | NS | |||
Not age adjusted | 21 | 1.34 (1.19-1.50) | 1.42 (1.18-1.71) | + |
Age adjusted | 98 | 1.16 (1.11-1.21) | 1.18 (1.10-1.26) | +++ |
Heterogeneity by age adjustment | NS | |||
Dose-response results not reported | 46 | 1.13 (1.06-1.21) | 1.18 (1.06-1.31) | ++ |
Only no dose-response stated | 2 | 0.95 (0.60-1.50) | 0.95 (0.60-1.50) | NS |
Dose-response results reported | 71 | 1.21 (1.15-1.28) | 1.24 (1.14-1.35) | +++ |
Heterogeneity by dose response reporting | NS | |||
Spouse the index | 71 | 1.18 (1.11-1.24) | 1.21 (1.12-1.31) | ++ |
Spouse not the index | 48 | 1.19 (1.12-1.27) | 1.20 (1.07-1.35) | +++ |
Heterogeneity by index definition | NS |
- Citation: Lee PN, Fry JS, Forey BA, Hamling JS, Thornton AJ. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and lung cancer: A systematic review. World J Meta-Anal 2016; 4(2): 10-43
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v4/i2/10.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v4.i2.10