Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Meta-Anal. Dec 26, 2015; 3(6): 284-294
Published online Dec 26, 2015. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v3.i6.284
Published online Dec 26, 2015. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v3.i6.284
Table 3 Summary of risk of bias assessment for the 7 studies included in meta-analysis
Ref. | Sequence generation adequate | Allocation concealed | Blinding | Intention-to-treat analysis performed | Exact data available | |
Patients | Healthcare providers | |||||
Mahon et al[14] | Yes | Unclear | No | No | No | Yes |
Mehta et al[15] | Yes | Unclear | No | No | Yes | Yes |
Grant et al[16,17] | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes |
Lundell et al[6,18] | Unclear | Unclear | No | No | Yes | Yes |
Anvari et al[19,20] | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes |
Spechler et al[21] | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes |
Lundell et al[22] and Galmiche et al[23] | Unclear | Unclear | No | No | Yes | Yes |
- Citation: Jiang Y, Cui WX, Wang Y, Heng D, Tan JC, Lin L. Antireflux surgery vs medical treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2015; 3(6): 284-294
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v3/i6/284.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v3.i6.284