Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Meta-Anal. Dec 26, 2015; 3(6): 232-253
Published online Dec 26, 2015. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v3.i6.232
Published online Dec 26, 2015. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v3.i6.232
Table 4 Re-intervention rates
Category and subgroups | Studies | Event rate (%) | 95%CI | P value | I2 value | |
Overall re-intervention rate | 20 | 13.6 | 10.1-18.0 | 0.000 | 68.79 | |
Indication | Palliation | 8 | 16.7 | 11.8-22.9 | 0.077 | 45.30 |
BTS | 4 | 3.3 | 1.2-8.4 | 0.758 | 0.00 | |
Center | Single Center | 17 | 14.2 | 10.3-19.2 | 0.000 | 70.10 |
Multicenter | 3 | 10.3 | 4.3-22.6 | 0.114 | 53.94 | |
Design | Prospective | 7 | 14.8 | 9.5-22.4 | 0.069 | 48.81 |
Retrospective | 12 | 13.6 | 9.1-19.9 | 0.000 | 75.17 | |
Region | Asia | 6 | 11.6 | 6.8-19.3 | 0.066 | 51.74 |
Europe | 9 | 13.2 | 8.8-19.4 | 0.011 | 59.63 | |
North America | 3 | 14.7 | 11.3-19.0 | 0.034 | 70.54 | |
Surgical intervention rate | 20 | 5.8 | 3.9-8.5 | 0.011 | 46.79 | |
Indication | Palliation | 8 | 7.6 | 4.1-13.8 | 0.048 | 50.62 |
BTS | 4 | 3.2 | 1.1-8.7 | 0.641 | 0.00 | |
Center | Single Center | 17 | 6.1 | 4.0-9.2 | 0.009 | 50.50 |
Multicenter | 3 | 3.6 | 1.3-9.2 | 0.675 | 0.00 | |
Design | Prospective | 7 | 5.1 | 2.6-9.8 | 0.193 | 30.76 |
Retrospective | 12 | 5.9 | 3.5-9.9 | 0.007 | 57.59 | |
Region | Asia | 6 | 4.2 | 2.2-7.9 | 0.411 | 0.81 |
Europe | 9 | 5.4 | 2.9-9.9 | 0.051 | 48.24 | |
North America | 3 | 9.2 | 3.7-21.2 | 0.016 | 75.87 | |
Endoscopic re-stent rate | 20 | 8.0 | 6.4-9.9 | 0.439 | 2.15 | |
Indication | Palliation | 8 | 9.7 | 6.6-14.2 | 0.304 | 16.02 |
BTS | 4 | 1.5 | 0.4-5.7 | 0.973 | 0.00 | |
Center | Single Center | 17 | 8.3 | 6.6-10.2 | 0.486 | 0.00 |
Multicenter | 3 | 3.9 | 1.1-12.3 | 0.296 | 17.95 | |
Design | Prospective | 7 | 8.4 | 5.3-13.1 | 0.320 | 14.45 |
Retrospective | 12 | 7.9 | 6.1-10.1 | 0.486 | 0.00 | |
Region | Asia | 6 | 8.5 | 4.5-15.3 | 0.113 | 43.89 |
Europe | 9 | 6.8 | 4.8-9.7 | 0.706 | 0.00 | |
North America | 3 | 8.3 | 5.7-11.8 | 0.600 | 0.00 | |
Other endoscopic intervention rate | 21 | 3.8 | 2.7-5.3 | 0.620 | 0.00 | |
Indication | Palliation | 8 | 3.1 | 1.5-6.1 | 0.601 | 0.00 |
BTS | 4 | 1.8 | 0.5-6.0 | 0.993 | 0.00 | |
Center | Single Center | 18 | 3.4 | 2.3-4.8 | 0.737 | 0.00 |
Multicenter | 3 | 6.3 | 2.7-13.7 | 0.333 | 8.99 | |
Design | Prospective | 7 | 4.2 | 2.3-7.7 | 0.412 | 1.59 |
Retrospective | 13 | 3.7 | 2.5-5.5 | 0.553 | 0.00 | |
Region | Asia | 6 | 1.8 | 0.8-4.3 | 0.980 | 0.00 |
Europe | 10 | 3.7 | 2.0-6.6 | 0.280 | 17.68 | |
North America | 3 | 4.7 | 2.9-7.8 | 0.475 | 0.00 |
- Citation: Thosani N, Banerjee S, Khanijow V, Rao B, Priyanka P, Ertan A, Guha S. Role of self-expanding metal stents in patients with malignant colorectal obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2015; 3(6): 232-253
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v3/i6/232.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v3.i6.232