Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Meta-Anal. Oct 26, 2015; 3(5): 215-224
Published online Oct 26, 2015. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v3.i5.215
Published online Oct 26, 2015. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v3.i5.215
Table 1 Distributions of the continuous endpoint for treatment and control groups
Scenario | Endpoint distribution | |
Treatment group | Control group | |
Normal | Mean = 5 and SD = 2 | Mean = 7 and SD = 2 |
Standard normal | Mean = 0 and SD = 1 | Mean = 0 and SD = 1 |
Gamma | Alpha = 2 and beta = 5 | Alpha = 2 and beta = 7 |
Exponential | Mean = 5 and lambda = 0.2 | Mean = 7 and lambda = 0.14 |
Bimodal | 50% Normal distribution with mean = 5 and SD = 2 and 50% standard normal distribution | 50% Normal distribution with mean = 7 and SD = 2 and 50% standard normal distribution |
ICU stay | Real-life data | Real-life data |
Hospital stay | Real-life data | Real-life data |
- Citation: Greco T, Biondi-Zoccai G, Gemma M, Guérin C, Zangrillo A, Landoni G. How to impute study-specific standard deviations in meta-analyses of skewed continuous endpoints? World J Meta-Anal 2015; 3(5): 215-224
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v3/i5/215.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v3.i5.215