Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Meta-Anal. Aug 26, 2015; 3(4): 193-205
Published online Aug 26, 2015. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v3.i4.193
Published online Aug 26, 2015. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v3.i4.193
Criteria |
Accurate ascertainment of cases |
Nonbiased selection of cases/controls with exclusion criteria applied equally to both |
Response rate |
Diagnostic testing procedures applied equally to each group |
Measurement of exposure accurate and applied equally to each group |
Appropriate attention to potential confounding variable |
Definition of ratings based on above criteria |
Good: Appropriate ascertainment of cases and nonbiased selection of case and control participants; exclusion criteria applied equally to cases and controls; response rate equal to or greater than 80%; diagnostic procedures and measurements accurate and applied equally to cases and controls; and appropriate attention to confounding variables |
Fair: Recent, relevant, without major apparent selection or diagnostic work-up bias but with response rate less than 80% or attention to some but not all important confounding variables |
Poor: Major selection or diagnostic work-up biases, response rates less than 50%, or inattention to confounding variables |
- Citation: So WK, Chan DN, Lou Y, Choi KC, Chan CW, Shin K, Kwong A, Lee DT. Brassiere wearing and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2015; 3(4): 193-205
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v3/i4/193.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v3.i4.193