Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Meta-Anal. Jun 26, 2015; 3(3): 142-150
Published online Jun 26, 2015. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v3.i3.142
Published online Jun 26, 2015. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v3.i3.142
Table 1 Assessment of existing systematic review quality assessment tools
Need | Modified OQAQ | AMSTAR |
Standardized quality assessment process across multiple reviewers with varying levels of experience | Insufficient detail to evaluate disputes | Confusing questions leading to inconsistent responses by same reviewer as well as between reviewers |
Single tool to assess a variety of included research designs including randomized trials and observational studies | Insufficient detail on methods | Insufficient detail on methods |
Detailed record of the review to facilitate updates of the evidence review | Insufficient detail for replication | Confusing questions leading to inconsistent responses by same reviewer and insufficient detail for replication |
Training tool for junior epidemiologists and interns in systematic review methods | Insufficient detail on methods | Insufficient detail on methods |
- Citation: Diekemper RL, Ireland BK, Merz LR. Development of the Documentation and Appraisal Review Tool for systematic reviews. World J Meta-Anal 2015; 3(3): 142-150
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v3/i3/142.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v3.i3.142