Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Meta-Anal. Feb 26, 2015; 3(1): 20-25
Published online Feb 26, 2015. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v3.i1.20
Published online Feb 26, 2015. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v3.i1.20
Year | Consensus meeting | No. of ref. | No. of meta-analyses/systematic reviews cited |
2007 | Maastricht III consensus | 99 | 10 (9.9%) |
2007 | Cervia II Working Group guideline | 72 | 5 (6.5%) |
2007 | American College of Gastroenterology guideline | 175 | 23 (13.1%) |
2009 | Second Asia-Pacific Consensus Guidelines | 118 | 12 (10.1%) |
2012 | Maastricht-Florence 4 guideline | 325 | 36 (11.0%) |
2013 | 3rd Brazilian Consensus | 216 | 25 (11.3%) |
2013 | Revised Korean consensus | 208 | 19 (9.3%) |
Total | 1223 | 130 (10.6%) |
-
Citation: Buzás GM. Fate of meta-analyses: The case of
Helicobacter pylori . World J Meta-Anal 2015; 3(1): 20-25 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v3/i1/20.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v3.i1.20