Female-specific vs conventional knee prostheses after total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

doi:10.13105/wjma.v2.i4.221

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 2, Issue 4

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (6727)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

322

WORD

241

HTML

3373

Figures (1-3)

160

Tables (1-5)

151

Sum=4247

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1212

Download

1268

Sum=2480

Nov 26, 2014 (publication date) through Jul 23, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Meta-Analysis

ISSN

2308-3840

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Meta-Anal. Nov 26, 2014; 2(4): 221-227
Published online Nov 26, 2014. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v2.i4.221

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Forest plot of deep infection with female-specific vs conventional prostheses after total knee arthroplasty. There was no significant significance between the 2 groups. CI: Confidence interval.

Citation: Rong GX, Huang L, Gui BJ, Xu AM, Zhang JL, Wang SS. Female-specific vs conventional knee prostheses after total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2014; 2(4): 221-227
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v2/i4/221.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v2.i4.221