Female-specific vs conventional knee prostheses after total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

Table 3 Clinical results: preoperative and postoperative range of motion, Hospital for Special Surgery scores

Study	Preoperative ROM		P	Postoperative ROM		P	Preoperative HSS		P	Postoperative HSS		P
	GSP	CP		GSP	CP		GSP	CP		GSP	CP
Kim et al[14]	127 (100-150)	123 (80-150)	NR	124 (85-140)	126 (85-140)	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR
Kim et al[15]	123 (85-150)	120 (58-150)	0.139	126 (85-140)	125 (80-140)	0.739	59.7 (37-58)	59.1 (37-68)	0.120	91.2 (77-100)	90.7 (84-100)	0.252
Tanavalee et al[16]	126	125.6	> 0.05	134.1	133.5	> 0.05	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR
Singh et al[17]	111.7 ± 13.5	110.5 ± 13.7	0.282	122.8 ± 8.0	119.9 ± 8.7	0.007	55.7 ± 9.1	56.7 ± 9.0	0.212	91.5 ± 4.8	91.9 ± 4.1	0.313
Song et al[18]	120.4 ± 16.6	121.8 ± 13.5	0.64	131.1 ± 9.2	133.7 ± 19.2	0.16	57.5 ± 11.5	57.1 ± 12.1	0.880	92.7 ± 8.0	92.1 ± 8.7	0.75
Lionberger et al[19]	102.7 ± 9.5	107.5 ± 11.5	0.048	123.4 ± 9.8	118.3 ± 9.7	0.023	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR
Thomsen et al[20]	NR	NR	NR	125 (105-142)	125 (105-139)	0.82	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR	NR

ROM: Range of motion; HSS: Hospital for special surgery scores; GSP: Gender-specific prostheses; CP: Conventional prostheses; NR: Not reported.