Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Meta-Anal. Nov 26, 2014; 2(4): 221-227
Published online Nov 26, 2014. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v2.i4.221
Published online Nov 26, 2014. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v2.i4.221
Study | Sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Assessor blinding | Incomplete outcome | Selective reporting |
Kim et al[14] | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes |
Kim et al[15] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Tanavalee et al[16] | No | No | No | Yes | Yes |
Singh et al[17] | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Yes |
Song et al[18] | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Lionberger et al[19] | No | No | No | Yes | Yes |
Thomsen et al[20] | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes |
-
Citation: Rong GX, Huang L, Gui BJ, Xu AM, Zhang JL, Wang SS. Female-specific
vs conventional knee prostheses after total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2014; 2(4): 221-227 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v2/i4/221.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v2.i4.221