Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Meta-Anal. Aug 26, 2014; 2(3): 107-126
Published online Aug 26, 2014. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v2.i3.107
Published online Aug 26, 2014. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v2.i3.107
Table 9 Subgroup analyses of 6-mo urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy or retropubic radical prostatectomy
Subgroup | Study | Sample size | Heterogeneity I2 (%) | P-value | Meta-analysis | |
OR | 95%CI | |||||
Country | Asia | 809 | 92 | 0.35 | 1.93 | 0.48-7.70 |
Europe/America | 862 | 0 | < 0.01 | 2.32 | 1.47-3.67 | |
Continence | 0 pad | 828 | 63 | < 0.01 | 3.09 | 1.65-5.80 |
definition | 0-1 pad | 673 | 82 | 0.52 | 1.62 | 0.37-7.06 |
Study design | prospective | 448 | 0 | < 0.01 | 2.48 | 1.44-4.26 |
retrospective | 1223 | 80 | 0.1 | 2.07 | 0.87-4.95 | |
Loss of follow-up | ≤ 20% | 1161 | 80 | 0.1 | 2.00 | 0.88-4.53 |
> 20% | 510 | 0 | < 0.01 | 2.99 | 1.55-5.77 |
- Citation: Shi MJ, Yang J, Meng XY, Li S, Liu T, Fang ZH, Cao R, Wang XH. Comparison of functional outcomes after retropubic, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2014; 2(3): 107-126
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v2/i3/107.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v2.i3.107