Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Meta-Anal. Aug 26, 2014; 2(3): 107-126
Published online Aug 26, 2014. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v2.i3.107
Published online Aug 26, 2014. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v2.i3.107
Table 8 Subgroup analyses of 12-mo urinary continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy or retropubic radical prostatectomy
Subgroup | Study | Sample size | Heterogeneity I2 (%) | P-value | Meta-analysis | |
OR | 95%CI | |||||
Country | Asia | 553 | 72 | 0.18 | 0.38 | 0.09-1.54 |
America | 911 | 89 | 0.91 | 0.95 | 0.35-2.55 | |
Europe | 1343 | 29 | 0.33 | 1.26 | 0.79-2.02 | |
Continence | 0 pad | 908 | 55 | 0.75 | 1.08 | 0.68-1.69 |
definition | 0-1 pad | 754 | 88 | 0.27 | 0.53 | 0.17-1.63 |
Study design | prospective | 509 | 83 | 0.51 | 1.26 | 0.63-2.53 |
retrospective | 1153 | 57 | 0.15 | 0.60 | 0.30-1.20 | |
Loss of follow-up | ≤ 20% | 451 | 82 | 0.82 | 1.09 | 0.51-2.33 |
> 20% | 1211 | 59 | 0.45 | 0.79 | 0.43-1.46 |
- Citation: Shi MJ, Yang J, Meng XY, Li S, Liu T, Fang ZH, Cao R, Wang XH. Comparison of functional outcomes after retropubic, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2014; 2(3): 107-126
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v2/i3/107.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v2.i3.107