Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Meta-Anal. Aug 26, 2014; 2(3): 107-126
Published online Aug 26, 2014. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v2.i3.107
Published online Aug 26, 2014. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v2.i3.107
Table 7 Subgroup analyses of 6-mo urinary continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy or retropubic radical prostatectomy
Subgroup | Study | Sample size | Heterogeneity I2(%) | P-value | Meta-analysis | |
OR | 95%CI | |||||
Country | Asia | 553 | 63 | 0.06 | 0.45 | 0.20-1.04 |
America | 346 | 0 | 0.45 | 0.83 | 0.51-1.34 | |
Europe | 763 | 80 | 0.40 | 1.46 | 0.60-3.55 | |
Continence definition | 0 pad | 1662 | 74 | 0.52 | 0.84 | 0.50-1.41 |
0-1 pad | 0 | - | - | - | - | |
Study design | prospective | 968 | 77 | 0.55 | 1.24 | 0.61-2.50 |
retrospective | 694 | 59 | 0.08 | 0.56 | 0.29-1.07 | |
Loss of follow-up | ≤ 20% | 911 | 71 | 0.87 | 1.06 | 0.53-2.09 |
> 20% | 751 | 78 | 0.32 | 0.66 | 0.29-1.51 |
- Citation: Shi MJ, Yang J, Meng XY, Li S, Liu T, Fang ZH, Cao R, Wang XH. Comparison of functional outcomes after retropubic, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2014; 2(3): 107-126
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v2/i3/107.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v2.i3.107