Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Meta-Anal. Aug 26, 2014; 2(3): 107-126
Published online Aug 26, 2014. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v2.i3.107
Table 12 Meta-regression of 12-mo potency recovery
TechniquesFactorsSample, nCoefficientP value95%CI
Lower CIUpper CI
LRP vs RRPAge8-0.03342220.682-0.1569470.2237914
Gleason Score5-0.00592560.732-0.56144230.4429304
PSA50.05097970.558-0.19612420.2980837
RARP vs RRPAge6-0.0063520.939-0.22210390.2093999
PSA50.00182090.892-0.03733310.0409749
RARP vs LRPAge6-0.04376470.535-0.22290240.1353731
BMI50.13407390.315-0.2206840.4888318
Prostate Volume4-0.00801520.894-0.23652140.2204911
PSA60.03500440.588-0.13010630.2001150