Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Meta-Anal. May 26, 2014; 2(2): 42-48
Published online May 26, 2014. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v2.i2.42
Published online May 26, 2014. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v2.i2.42
Ref. | Group | POT | No. of patients | LOS | ERCP ± ES postoperative | Compli-cations |
Aboulian et al[44], 2010 | Early | 35.1 | 25 | 3.5 ± 2.04 | 6 | 0 |
Delayed | 77.8 | 25 | 5.8 ± 5.35 | 4 | 0 | |
Rosing et al[42], 2007 | Early | 48 | 43 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
Delayed | 120 | 177 | 7 | 24 | 9 | |
Taylor et al[43], 2004 | Early | 43.2 | 26 | 3.5 | 6 (1) | 3 |
Delayed | 55.2 | 20 | 4.7 | 7 (2) | 2 | |
Falor et al[45], 2012 | Early | < 48 | 117 | 3.4 ± 2.20 | 19 (12) | 5 |
Delayed | > 48 | 186 | 6.3 ± 2.08 | 51 (19) | 9 |
- Citation: Hu C, Shen SQ, Chen ZB. Treatment strategy for gallstone pancreatitis and the timing of cholecystectomy. World J Meta-Anal 2014; 2(2): 42-48
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v2/i2/42.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v2.i2.42