Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Meta-Anal. Mar 18, 2025; 13(1): 99971
Published online Mar 18, 2025. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v13.i1.99971
Published online Mar 18, 2025. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v13.i1.99971
Table 2 Essential features of the included research
Ref. | Test group | Control group | Duration | Main evaluation scales |
Bais et al[18] | 9000 Lux | 100 Lux | 30 minutes/day, 6 weeks | EPDS; HAMD |
Corral et al[20] | 10000 Lux | 600 Lux | 30 minutes/day, 6 weeks | EPDS; SIGH-SAD |
Donmez et al[19] | 10000 Lux | < 500 Lux | 45 minutes/day, 3 weeks | EPDS; HAMD; SIGH-SAD |
Epperson et al[21] | 7000 Lux | 500 Lux | 60 minutes/day, 5 weeks | EPDS; HAMD; SIGH-SAD |
Garbazza et al[22] | 10000 Lux | 19 Lux | 30 minutes/day, 6 weeks | EPDS |
Wirz-Justice et al[23] | 7000 Lux | 70 Lux | 60 minutes/day, 5 weeks | SIGH-SAD; HAMD |
- Citation: Yang X, Gao YY, Xu SQ, Wang JC, Ma YJ, Jiao LH, Wang L, Wang XY, Bashir S, An CX, Wang R. Efficacy of bright light therapy for perinatal depression: A meta-analysis of a randomized controlled trial. World J Meta-Anal 2025; 13(1): 99971
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v13/i1/99971.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v13.i1.99971