Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Meta-Anal. Mar 18, 2025; 13(1): 98933
Published online Mar 18, 2025. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v13.i1.98933
Table 5 Risk of bias assessment of case series on Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool
Ref.
Were there clear criteria for inclusion in the case series
Was the condition measured in a standard, reliable way for all participants included in the case series
Were valid methods used for identification of the condition for all participants included in the case series
Did the case series have consecutive inclusion of participants
Did the case series have complete inclusion of participants
Was there clear reporting of the demographics of the participants in the study
Was there clear reporting of clinical information of the participants
Were the outcomes or follow up results of cases clearly reported
Was there clear reporting of the presenting site(s)/clinic(s) demographic information
Was statistical analysis appropriate
Score
Kar et al[21], 2020UnclearUnclearYesUnclearUnclearUnclear Yes Yes UnclearNA30%
Aydin et al[17], 2020UnclearYesYesUnclearUnclearUnclearYesYesUnclearNA40%