Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Meta-Anal. Mar 18, 2025; 13(1): 98933
Published online Mar 18, 2025. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v13.i1.98933
Table 4 Risk of bias assessment of cohort study on Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool
Ref.
Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population
Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people to both exposed and unexposed groups
Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way
Were confounding factors identified
Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated
Were the groups/participants free of the outcome at the start of the study (or at the moment of exposure)
Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way
Was the follow up time reported and sufficient to be long enough for outcomes to occur
Was follow up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to follow up described and explored
Were strategies to address incomplete follow up utilized
Was appropriate statistical analysis used
Score
Di Ponzio et al[19], 2023YesNAYes YesYesYesYesYesUnclearNoYes73%