Scientometrics Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Meta-Anal. Mar 18, 2025; 13(1): 102634
Published online Mar 18, 2025. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v13.i1.102634
Bibliometric analysis of original studies on stereoelectroencephalography from 1990 to 2023
Wei-Lin Yang, Xian-Jie Zhang, Wen-Cai Jiang, Department of Anesthesiology, Deyang People’s Hospital, Deyang 618000, Sichuan Province, China
Rui Zhou, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200434, China
ORCID number: Wei-Lin Yang (0009-0009-0105-0513); Rui Zhou (0000-0002-1479-4409); Wen-Cai Jiang (0009-0006-5406-233X).
Author contributions: Yang WL, Jiang WC and Zhou R conceived and designed the study; Yang WL and Zhou R participated in data processing and analysis; Yang WL, Jiang WC, Zhou R, Zhang XJ drafted the manuscript; Yang WL and Jiang WC contributed to data analysis and interpretation; Zhang XJ supervised the review of the study. All authors seriously revised and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
PRISMA 2009 Checklist statement: The authors have read the PRISMA 2009 Checklist, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the PRISMA 2009 Checklist.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Wen-Cai Jiang, Department of Anesthesiology, Deyang People’s Hospital, No. 173 Taishan Road Section 1, Deyang 618000, Sichuan Province, China. jiang940724@163.com
Received: October 24, 2024
Revised: January 4, 2025
Accepted: February 18, 2025
Published online: March 18, 2025
Processing time: 141 Days and 15.2 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a minimally invasive preoperative evaluation of drug-resistant focal epilepsies. Increasing preclinical data show that SEEG has tremendous diagnostic and therapeutic value for epilepsy. There are currently many studies on SEEG.

AIM

To summarize the development and application of SEEG.

METHODS

We conducted a bibliometric analysis of research on SEEG from 2019 to 2023. We obtained publications on SEEG from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. Excel, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace were responsible for the analyses. A variety of bibliographic elements were collected, including annual publications, authors, countries/regions, journals, keywords, etc.

RESULTS

A total of 691 publications were included in this study. Professor Fabrice Bartolomei of Timone Hospital in France was the most productive and influential author in the field of SEEG, whereas the authors from the United States were the leaders in general. In addition, we found that deep learning and source localization in SEEG have been popular in recent years.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of SEEG research and highlights the growing interest in SEEG and its deep learning and source localization.

Key Words: Stereoelectroencephalography; Neurology; Bibliometric analysis; Science Core Collection; VOSviewer; CiteSpace

Core Tip: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a popular issue recently. The United States, China, and France are in the leading place. Epilepsia, Clinical Neurophysiology, Journal of Neurosurgery, and Frontiers in Neurology are the most popular journals in this field. Epilepsy is still the primary clinical application of SEEG, while deep learning and source localization have strongly increased.



INTRODUCTION

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) was first formed in the 1950s at Saint Anne Hospital in France and was designed and developed in the 1960s in France by Talairach et al[1]. SEEG uses stereotactic techniques to place intracranial electrodes to record intracranial electrical activity and direct electrical stimulation to identify epileptogenic areas in patients with focal epilepsy[2-4]. SEEG is a diagnostic tool for drug-resistant focal epilepsies, showing precise positioning, minimal trauma, high patient tolerance, and other advantages[5,6]. A recent study demonstrated the performance of deep learning on SEEG signals and demonstrated that the deep learning method was beneficial for the decoding process because it is good at translating brain signals into commands for controlling external devices[7]. Another study showed that SEEG source localization is useful for corroborating the epileptogenic zone because it is inherently three-dimensional and can be modeled through source localization[8]. As a result, SEEG has attracted increasing attention in the research field of deep learning and source localization for drug-resistant focal epilepsies.

Bibliometrics is a technique employed to assess and examine the advancement of a specific field of science[9]. It utilizes computer technologies to present visual representations of literature analysis outcomes in a concise and comprehensible graphical format[10]. Overall, bibliometric analysis offers a comprehensive approach to evaluating academic productivity, summarizing academic frontiers and hotspots, and predicting trends within a particular research field. By understanding the results of bibliometric analysis, researchers can gain valuable insights into the scholarly landscape and make informed decisions regarding their research endeavors.

This study aims to analyze the bibliometric characteristics of the original studies on SEEG over the past 5 years; to analyze the publication trends, popular research topics, and cutting-edge trends in this field; and to provide references for clinicians and researchers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Data source and search strategy

The literature was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) on 15 November 2023. After the inclusion and exclusion criteria were determined, the following formula was used as the retrieval strategy: TS = “stereotactic EEG” OR “stereoelectroencephalography” OR “SEEG” OR “stereoelectroencephalography SEEG” OR “intracranial EEG” OR “intracranial encephalography” OR “IEEG”. The literature type was restricted to “article”, and the publication year was limited to 2019 to 2023. To adequately retrieve the relevant literature, an exact search was not performed.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The original research related to SEEG, identified through the WoSCC database and published between 2019 and 2023, was further screened. Conversely, reviews, conference papers, letters, editorials, and notes, as well as retracted papers, were excluded from the analysis. There were no language restrictions.

Data screening and extraction

To ensure the reliability of the results, two independent researchers meticulously selected the literature by reading the abstracts and methods. Divergence in literature selection was settled by discussion or consultation with specialists. Consequently, all retrieved records were downloaded in “plain text” and “Excel” formats. Relevant parameters, such as titles, publication years, citation times, authors, countries/regions, institutions, journals, keywords, usage counts, WoS categories, etc., were extracted for further analysis.

Data analysis and visualization

Descriptive statistics from Microsoft Excel (V2021) were used to present the publication trends and cumulative citations. VOSviewer (V. 1.6.20) and CiteSpace (V. 6.2. R6) software were applied to perform knowledge mapping analysis, including the author, institution, country/region, journal, and keywords. Keywords serve as concise summaries of a paper’s core content and essence, and through keyword co-occurrence analysis, researchers can gain insights into the research hotspots within a scientific domain. In this study, VOSviewer was employed to construct a network visualization of keyword cooccurrences from the 691 documents. We merged synonyms such as “stereoelectroencephalography”, “stereotactic EEG”, “stereotactic electroencephalography”, “stereoelectroencephalography” and other synonyms into “SEEG”.

VOSviewer was employed to conduct coauthorship analyses of the author, institution country/region, and journal. VOSviewer also provided us with the publication and citation counts. The relatedness of the nodes in VOSviewer figures is determined by their number of coauthored publications. In addition, we applied VOSviewer to conduct a co-occurrence analysis for the keywords. Finally, CiteSpace was used to perform the citation burst analysis of keywords.

RESULTS

In the present study, we identified 6453 records by the above formula in the WoSCC on 15 November 2023. A total of 2339 publications were published between 2019 and 2023, of which 1831 records were tagged “Articles”. After further screening the document type and relevance, 691 original research publications were ultimately included. The number of articles written in English, German, and Russian are 689, 1, and 1, respectively. The study procedure is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Flow chart of the main steps of this study.
Annual trend of publications

Our analysis revealed that the number of publications markedly increased from 2019 to 2021 (a peak level of 169 in 2021) and then decreased from 2022 to 2023 (Figure 2). The mean number of publications per year was 138.3, and the median was 143 (Figure 2). The cumulative number of citations of these articles increased from 1591 to 4246 during the last five years (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Figure 2 Annual trends of global scientific publications from 2019 to 2023.
The most productive and influential authors

The publication and citation numbers of the authors were identified via VOSviewer software. In total, 3161 authors participated in publishing the articles. The top 10 authors are listed in Table 1. Fabrice Bartolomei (62 publications) was far ahead of the others, emerging as the most prolific author. Other productive authors included Lagarde Stanislas (33 publications), Zhang Kai (25 publications), Carron Romain (24 publications), McGonigal Aileen (23 publications), Zhang Chao (23 publications), Wang Xiu (21 publications), etc. With 577 citations, Fabrice Bartolomei was also the most influential researcher in this field, followed by Lagarde Stanislas (387 citations) and McGonigal Aileen (324 citations).

Table 1 Top 10 authors in stereoelectroencephalography research.
Rank
Author
Documents
Citations
1Fabrice Bartolomei62577
2Lagarde Stanislas33387
3Zhang Kai25181
4Carron Romain24301
5Mcgonigal Aileen23324
6Zhang Chao23156
7Wang Xiu21173
8Trebuchon Agnes20278
9Yu Tao1846
10Hu Wenhan1591
Most productive and influential scientific organizations

VOSviewer software was employed to identify the publication and citation numbers of the scientific organizations. A total of 901 institutions published their works in the last five years. Among the 691 publications, 529 involved multiple institutions, and 196 represented international collaborations. Capital Medical University published 85 articles on SEEG, ranking first, followed by Aix-Marseille University (77 articles), Timone Hospital (48 articles), Fudan University (24 articles), and Shanghai Jiao Tong University (23 articles), and the top 10 organizations are listed in Table 2. Aix-Marseille University had the most citations (n = 701), followed by Timone Hospital (n = 462) and Capital Medical University (n = 378).

Table 2 Top 10 organizations in stereoelectroencephalography research.
Rank
Organizations
Count
Citations
Country
1Capital Medical University85378China
2Aix-Marseille University77701France
3Timone Hospital48462France
4Fudan University24100China
5Shanghai Jiao Tong University2383China
6University College London22179United Kingdom
7University of Pittsburgh2286United States
8Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda21291Italy
9McGill university20194Canada
10Cleveland clinic18186United States
Distribution analysis of the country and regions

Country analysis was performed by VOSviewer. Our evaluation revealed that the articles belonged to 45 countries or regions. The United States of America has the highest number of publications (n = 270) on SEEG, far ahead of China (n = 155) and France (n = 132), followed by Italy (n = 53) and Canada (n = 51). The rule of the citation rank was similar to that of the publication number. Figure 3 shows the citation relationships of the countries or regions that had at least 5 publications and Table 3 shows the top 10 countries in terms of the publications. Notably, numerous countries maintain strong connections with both the United States and France. Nevertheless, countries in yellow, including China, Spain, Austria, Belgium, Romania, and the Czech Republic, boomed in this field.

Figure 3
Figure 3 Citation analysis of the countries or regions. The threshold for each node presented in the map is set as 5 publications.
Table 3 Top 10 countries in stereoelectroencephalography research.
Rank
Country
Documents
Citations
1United States2701778
2China155658
3France1321118
4Italy53484
5Canada51394
6United Kingdom48411
7Germany29224
8Australia25153
9Spain22117
10Japan18119
Popular journals

We utilized VOSviewer to analyze the journals that published the articles. These articles were recorded by 156 journals, and 10 journals recorded more than 20 articles. Table 4 shows the top 10 journals in terms of the publications. With 45 documents, Epilepsia published the largest number of articles in this field, followed by Clinical Neurophysiology (39 documents) and the Journal of Neurosurgery (32 documents). In terms of the total number of citations, Epilepsia (n = 549), Journal of Neurosurgery (n = 243), and Clinical Neurophysiology (n = 224) also ranked in the top 3. However, yellow nodes in the citation analysis map (Figure 4), such as Epilepsia, Neurology, and Cortex, had higher average citations.

Figure 4
Figure 4 Citation analysis of the journals. The threshold for each node presented in the map is set as 5 publications.
Table 4 Top 10 journals of the number of publications on stereoelectroencephalography studies.
Rank
Journal
Documents
Citations
1Epilepsia45549
2Clinical Neurophysiology39224
3Journal of Neurosurgery32243
4Frontiers in Neurology2793
5Epilepsy Research25117
6Epilepsy & Behavior24163
7Seizure21125
8Journal of Neural Engineering2181
9Epilepsy and Behavior Reports2131
10Epileptic Disorders2119
Keywords analysis

The results are presented in Figure 5. Keywords with a frequency of 10 or higher were presented. As depicted, the identified keywords are organized into 5 distinct clusters. The green cluster primarily encompasses keywords pertinent to the clinical applications of SEEG, and the red cluster focuses on encephalic regions and functions.

Figure 5
Figure 5 Keywords network. The lowest frequency in the articles of these nodes is 10.

The related research on SEEG encompasses various aspects, such as its working principle, action site, and research object. By utilizing relevant keywords, ten distinct clusters were generated, providing a comprehensive overview of the field. Figure 6 depicts the temporal evolution of keywords via the utilization of CiteSpace software, revealing a dynamic research domain marked by evolving topics, including direct electrical stimulation, the epileptogenic zone, and medically refractory epilepsy. Notably, epilepsy was the primary topic of SEEG, other issues such as sleep and memory were also involved. By further analysis with CiteSpace, we obtained the keywords with the strongest citation bursts (Figure 7). Among them, deep learning and source localization have booming tendencies.

Figure 6
Figure 6 Timeline visualization of keyword analysis. SEEG: Stereoelectroencephalography.
Figure 7
Figure 7 The 10 keywords with the strongest citation bursts in the past 5 years.
DISCUSSION

Bibliometric analysis has emerged as an effective, objective, and reproducible tool for analyzing research output within a specific field[11]. In the present study, we analyzed 691 articles that investigated SEEG. Interestingly, the number of publications in this field remains high. This result highlights the great interest of global researchers in SEEG, underscores the value of SEEG, and highlights its importance across the board. It is therefore likely that the emphasis on SEEG will continue in the future.

In terms of author contributions, more than 3000 researchers have published related articles. Professor Fabrice Bartolomei, an expert on epilepsy from Timone Hospital in France, is the most productive and influential researcher in the field of SEEG. His first studies on epilepsy demonstrated the mechanism of seizure-related humming via SEEG techniques[12]. Many clinical investigations on epilepsy have been conducted since then. The most frequently cited study was published in 2019, indicating the determinants and prognosis of seizure onset patterns for focal epilepsies[13]. Recently, his team focused on investigating SEEG markers for epilepsy[14,15].

The United States, China, and France ranked in the top three countries in terms of the number of publications, which means that these three countries represent the highest level of SEEG research worldwide and make the greatest contribution to this field. The co-authorship map of countries revealed global cooperation in this field, with the United States and France exhibiting notably greater centrality. However, China, which ranks in the top three by publications, has relatively less cooperation with other countries. Therefore, China should enhance its international cooperation and carry out more comprehensive and profound research on SEEG.

The present study revealed that the most highly cited journal in this field was Epilepsia, with 45 documents and 549 citations, followed by Clinical Neurophysiology, the Journal of Neurosurgery, and Frontiers in Neurology. Therefore, we believe that these journals will continue publishing influential and advanced research in this field in the future. Experts and scholars who have a keen interest in the subject will discover a plethora of novel developments and cutting-edge research in these journals.

Keywords encapsulate the core of papers, revealing the hotspots of research. Keyword co-occurrence analysis pinpoints scientific hotspots. Visual network diagrams clarify evolving trends. Burst keywords track historical development and suggest future research directions. The analyses of keywords revealed that some keywords, such as “surgical technique”, “effective connectivity” and “seizure onset patterns”, have been researching hotspots in this field in the past. SEEG’s accurate identification determines the surgical prognosis, and this characteristic has shifted the research trend toward ‘surgical technique’. However, “deep learning” and “source localization” have been the most popular topics in recent years. Clinical research can focus on these aspects. Machine learning is playing an increasingly important role in medical image analysis. In contrast to these traditional decoding techniques, the equivalent or superior performance of deep learning methods has been demonstrated across various studies utilizing SEEG[16,17]. Ictal SEEG source localization is valid and useful for corroborating the epileptogenic zone[18]. Therefore, it is important to develop deep learning and source localization for SEEG, and future research on deep learning and source localization will involve more clinical applications.

Currently, our knowledge regarding epilepsy networks and human brain functional networks remains limited. However, SEEG plays an important role and has emerged as the preferred method for intracranial monitoring in epilepsy patients[4]. As the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches based on SEEG continue to evolve, they promise to significantly increase the quality of life for individuals living with drug-resistant epilepsy[19,20]. Based on these analyses, we predict that these studies on deep learning and source localization will continue to be hotspots in the field of SEEG.

Limitations

This study has certain limitations. First, the exclusive reliance on data from the WoSCC database presents a challenge, as it inevitably leads to concerns regarding the comprehensiveness of the analyzed data. Nevertheless, the WoSCC database encompasses a vast repository of high-quality academic journals, conference papers, and patents from across the globe. It is the articles of superior quality, rather than those of subpar quality, that catalyze the advancement of scientific research. Second, research results generally reach their peak of citations one to two years after publication or release, which can lead to a lag in the evaluation results of bibliometric analysis and may not reflect the latest research results and trends over time.

CONCLUSION

In this study, 691 articles published in the last 5 years were analyzed via bibliometrics to clarify the current status and future trends of SEEG research. The number of publications markedly increased from 2019 to 2023. Fabrice Bartolomei is the most prolific and influential author. The Capital Medical University of China ranks first in terms of publication number. Additionally, the United States has the highest number of publications and citations. Epilepsia, Clinical Neurophysiology, Journal of Neurosurgery, and Frontiers in Neurology are the most popular journals in the field of SEEG. Epilepsy is still the primary clinical application of SEEG, while deep learning and source localization have strongly increased recently. Overall, our study provides a useful reference for further research on SEEG.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Critical care medicine

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade A, Grade B, Grade D

Novelty: Grade B, Grade B, Grade B

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B, Grade B, Grade C

Scientific Significance: Grade A, Grade B, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Feng XL; Yang WZ; Zhu Q S-Editor: Liu H L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zhao YQ

References
1.  Talairach J, Bancaud J, Bonis A, Szikla G, Tournoux P. Functional stereotaxic exploration of epilepsy. Confin Neurol. 1962;22:328-331.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 86]  [Cited by in RCA: 91]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Isnard J, Taussig D, Bartolomei F, Bourdillon P, Catenoix H, Chassoux F, Chipaux M, Clémenceau S, Colnat-Coulbois S, Denuelle M, Derrey S, Devaux B, Dorfmüller G, Gilard V, Guenot M, Job-Chapron AS, Landré E, Lebas A, Maillard L, McGonigal A, Minotti L, Montavont A, Navarro V, Nica A, Reyns N, Scholly J, Sol JC, Szurhaj W, Trebuchon A, Tyvaert L, Valenti-Hirsch MP, Valton L, Vignal JP, Sauleau P. French guidelines on stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG). Neurophysiol Clin. 2018;48:5-13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 121]  [Cited by in RCA: 195]  [Article Influence: 24.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  McGonigal A. Frontal lobe seizures: overview and update. J Neurol. 2022;269:3363-3371.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Buch VP, Parvizi J. Evolution of SEEG Strategy: Stanford Experience. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2024;35:83-85.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Tandon N, Tong BA, Friedman ER, Johnson JA, Von Allmen G, Thomas MS, Hope OA, Kalamangalam GP, Slater JD, Thompson SA. Analysis of Morbidity and Outcomes Associated With Use of Subdural Grids vs Stereoelectroencephalography in Patients With Intractable Epilepsy. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76:672-681.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 93]  [Cited by in RCA: 136]  [Article Influence: 27.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Kim LH, Parker JJ, Ho AL, Feng AY, Kumar KK, Chen KS, Ojukwu DI, Shuer LM, Grant GA, Graber KD, Halpern CH. Contemporaneous evaluation of patient experience, surgical strategy, and seizure outcomes in patients undergoing stereoelectroencephalography or subdural electrode monitoring. Epilepsia. 2021;62:74-84.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Wu X, Jiang S, Li G, Liu S, Metcalfe B, Chen L, Zhang D. Deep Learning With Convolutional Neural Networks for Motor Brain-Computer Interfaces Based on Stereo-Electroencephalography (SEEG). IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2023;27:2387-2398.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Satzer D, Esengul YT, Warnke PC, Issa NP, Nordli DR Jr. Source localization of ictal SEEG to predict postoperative seizure outcome. Clin Neurophysiol. 2022;144:142-150.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Ninkov A, Frank JR, Maggio LA. Bibliometrics: Methods for studying academic publishing. Perspect Med Educ. 2022;11:173-176.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in RCA: 259]  [Article Influence: 86.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  He T, Wang D, Wu Z, Huang C, Xu X, Xu X, Liu C, Hashimoto K, Yang C. A bibliometric analysis of research on (R)-ketamine from 2002 to 2021. Neuropharmacology. 2022;218:109207.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Wang L, Chen Y, Shen W, Fan X, Jia M, Fu G, Chi X, Liang X, Zhang Y. A Bibliometric Analysis of Cardioembolic Stroke From 2012 to 2022. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023;48:101537.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Bartolomei F, Wendling F, Vignal JP, Chauvel P, Liégeois-Chauvel C. Neural networks underlying epileptic humming. Epilepsia. 2002;43:1001-1012.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in RCA: 26]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Lagarde S, Buzori S, Trebuchon A, Carron R, Scavarda D, Milh M, McGonigal A, Bartolomei F. The repertoire of seizure onset patterns in human focal epilepsies: Determinants and prognostic values. Epilepsia. 2019;60:85-95.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 74]  [Cited by in RCA: 77]  [Article Influence: 11.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Makhalova J, Madec T, Medina Villalon S, Jegou A, Lagarde S, Carron R, Scavarda D, Garnier E, Bénar CG, Bartolomei F. The role of quantitative markers in surgical prognostication after stereoelectroencephalography. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2023;10:2114-2126.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Runfola C, Sheheitli H, Bartolomei F, Wang H, Jirsa V. In pursuit of the epileptogenic zone in focal epilepsy:a dynamical network biomarker approach. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2023;117:106973.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Yuan J, Ran X, Liu K, Yao C, Yao Y, Wu H, Liu Q. Machine learning applications on neuroimaging for diagnosis and prognosis of epilepsy: A review. J Neurosci Methods. 2022;368:109441.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Wang Y, Yang Y, Cao G, Guo J, Wei P, Feng T, Dai Y, Huang J, Kang G, Zhao G. SEEG-Net: An explainable and deep learning-based cross-subject pathological activity detection method for drug-resistant epilepsy. Comput Biol Med. 2022;148:105703.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Caune V, Ranta R, Le Cam S, Hofmanis J, Maillard L, Koessler L, Louis-Dorr V. Evaluating dipolar source localization feasibility from intracerebral SEEG recordings. Neuroimage. 2014;98:118-133.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in RCA: 38]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Feys O, Goldman S, Lolli V, Depondt C, Legros B, Gaspard N, Schuind S, De Tiège X, Rikir E. Diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in refractory insular epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2023;64:1409-1423.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Kerezoudis P, Gyftopoulos A, Alexander AY, Keith Starnes D, Nickels KC, Worrell GA, Wirrell EC, Lundstrom BN, Van Gompel JJ, Miller KJ. Safety and efficacy of responsive neurostimulation in the pediatric population: Evidence from institutional review and patient-level meta-analysis. Epilepsy Behav. 2022;129:108646.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 20]  [Article Influence: 6.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]