Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Meta-Anal. Mar 18, 2025; 13(1): 100176
Published online Mar 18, 2025. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v13.i1.100176
Table 3 Comparison between covered self-expanding metal stents, uncovered self-expanding metal stents and silicone stents, n (%)

Patients with covered SEMS (n = 468)
Patients with uncovered SEMS (n = 432)
Silicone stent study (No. 1) (n = 263)
Silicone stent study (No. 2) (n = 63)
Silicone stent study (No. 3) (n = 58)
Silicone stent study (No. 4) (n = 75)
Successful insertions511 (98.6)1462 (88.2)2181 (69.0)--70 (93.3)
Successful removals305 (95.0)390 (93.8)4117 (54.7)--49 (65.0)
Stent-related deaths0 (0.0)1 (0.2)2 (0.8)---
Stent complication rate
Stent migration58 (12.4)30 (6.9)78 (18.6)562 (28.0)510 (17.2)38 (51.0)
Granulation tissue formation124 (26.5)87 (20.1)72 (17.2)5---
Infection6 (1.3)57 (13.2)--14 (24.1)-
Restenosis7 (1.5)46 (10.6)24 (5.7)5--30 (40.0)
Stent fracture12 (2.6)32 (7.4)--1 (1.7)-
Bleeding0 (0.0)25 (5.8)---1 (1.3)
Pneumothorax0 (0.0)12 (2.8)---5 (6.67)
Mucus plugging7 (1.5)4 (0.9)-131 (60.0)521 (36.2)14 (19.0)
Others648 (10.3)15 (3.5)-18 (8.0)56 (10.3)-