Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Meta-Anal. Mar 18, 2025; 13(1): 100176
Published online Mar 18, 2025. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v13.i1.100176
Table 2 Comparison between covered-self-expanding metal stents and uncovered- self-expanding metal stents, n (%)

All patients with SEMS (n = 900)
Patients with covered SEMS (n = 468)
Patients with uncovered SEMS (n = 432)
P value (fisher's exact test)7
Successful insertions1013 (93.6)1511 (98.6)2462 (88.2)3< 0.001
Successful removals435 (95.2)4305 (95.0)590 (93.8)60.607
Stent-related deaths1 (0.1)0 (0.0)1 (0.2)0.480
Complication rate
Stent migration88 (9.8)58 (12.4)30 (6.9)0.007
Granulation tissue formation211 (23.0)124 (26.5)87 (20.1)0.027
Infection63 (7.0)6 (1.3)57 (13.2)< 0.001
Restenosis53 (5.9)7 (1.5)46 (10.6)< 0.001
Stent fracture44 (4.9)12 (2.6)32 (7.4)0.001
Bleeding25 (2.8)0 (0.0)25 (5.8)< 0.001
Pneumothorax12 (1.3)0 (0.0)12 (2.8)< 0.001
Mucus plugging11 (1.2)7 (1.5)4 (0.9)0.550
Others863 (7.0)48 (10.3)15 (3.5)< 0.001