Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Meta-Anal. Dec 18, 2024; 12(4): 98508
Published online Dec 18, 2024. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v12.i4.98508
Published online Dec 18, 2024. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v12.i4.98508
Figure 5 SUCRA comparison of different treatment methods.
A: The results of the network meta-analysis indicated that the SUCRA values ranked from high to low as follows: Azelastine-fluticasone (AF) (99.6%), fluticasone propionate (FP) (54.4%), fluticasone furoate (FF) (46.0%), and placebo (0.0%); B: The network meta-analysis results indicated SUCRA values ranked from high to low as follows: AF (99.5%), FP (66.4%), FF (34.1%), and placebo (0.0%). AF: Azelastine-fluticasone; FP: Fluticasone propionate; FF: Fluticasone furoate.
- Citation: Qin JY, Huang G, Pan ZH, Liao LF, Hu HF. Different medications for seasonal allergic rhinitis in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2024; 12(4): 98508
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v12/i4/98508.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v12.i4.98508