Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Meta-Anal. Dec 18, 2024; 12(4): 100726
Published online Dec 18, 2024. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v12.i4.100726
Table 4 Characteristics of included studies
Ref.
Aims
Patient selection criteria stated in their paper
Koback-Larsen et al[24]To determine the polyp detection rate for polyps > 9 mm by colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy, as well as the diagnostic accuracy of CCEIndividuals who had a positive immuno-fecal-occult blood test during screening
Spada et al[27]To assess the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of CCE-2 in a head-to-head comparison with colonoscopyPatients aged 18-80 who were scheduled to undergo colonoscopy for either known or suspected colonic disease
Eliakim et al[29]To compare the second-generation PillCam with colonoscopy as an update on their earlier paper (first generation)Patients aged 18-57, who were scheduled to undergo colonoscopy for either known or suspected colonic disease
Pilz et al[30]To compare the efficacy of CCE against routine screening colonoscopyMen and women above the age of 50 years without symptoms, or with lower- gastrointestinal signs and symptoms; and individuals 18-50 years with positive family history for CRC
Hagel et al[25]To assess the PillCam Colon 2 capsule regarding feasibility, sensitivity, and specificity for the detection of colonic pathologies and additional recorded extracolonic findingsPatients scheduled to undergo CCE for known or suspected colonic diseases
Holleran et al[26]To assess the sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of CCE compared with optical colonoscopy in a FIT-positive CRC screening cohortParticipants with a positive FIT result
Sacher-Huvelin et al[31]To conduct a prospective, multi-center trial to compare CCE and colonoscopy in asymptomatic subjects enrolled in screening or surveillance program for the detection of colorectal neoplasiaHealthy, asymptomatic individual with a personal or family history of CRC or polyps
Akyüz et al[32]To evaluate both the optimal cleaning regimen for CCE and the diagnostic value of test in the study groupUnclear. States 28 patients. Discounted patients with: “gastrointestinal dysmotility, suspected/known strictures, pregnancy, abdomen surgery in the past 6 months, life-threatening conditions.”
Eliakim et al[28]Comparing PillCam (first-generation) colon capsule endoscopy with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic diseasePatients aged 18-75 who were either suspected of having colonic disease and had been referred for conventional colonoscopy or who were being referred for colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening