Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Meta-Anal. Sep 18, 2024; 12(3): 97210
Published online Sep 18, 2024. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v12.i3.97210
Table 6 Summary of studies correlating clinical activity with intestinal ultrasound
Ref.
Study type
Number of patients
IUS predictors
Clinical score
Parameters studied
Goodsall et al[4] Prospective19 UC (29 paired data)MUCSCCAI, Mayo score Mayo score: r = 0.307; 95%CI, 0.020-0.595; P = 0.036; SCCAI score: r = 0.04; 95%CI, −0.21 to 0.28; P = 0.768
Kinoshita et al[54]Prospective, multi-centre156 UCUltrasound severity score based on BWT, BWS, hypoechoic/hyperechoic changes in submucosa/mucosaRachmilewitz clinical activity indexr = 0.40, P < 0.001
Lim et al[63]Prospective cross-sectional29 UC, 22 CDBWT, CDS, BWS, i-fatPartial Mayo score r = 0.192, P = 0.317
Maaser et al[28]Prospective, multi-center 224 UCBWTSCCAISigmoid colon: Baseline: r = 0.187; 12 wk: r = 0.547; descending colon: Baseline: r = 0.262; 12 wk: r = 0.5
Saleh et al[89]Retrospective39 UC, 108 DCBWT, CDS, i-fat, BWS, lymph node, free fluid, haustartion, motility Mayo score, UCAIr = 0.016 Mayo score (P = 0.002); UCAI (P = 0.014)
de Voogd et al[2]Prospective, single centre16 UC, 22 CDBWT, CDS, haustrations, BWS, fatty wrappingSCCAI, Lichtiger index SCCAI and BWT in the SC (r = 0.65, P < 0.0001) and DC (r = 0.59, P < 0.002). Lichtiger score and BWT SC (r = 0.65, P = 0.001) and DC (r =0.63, P = 0.001)
Yamada et al[62]Prospective26SWE, SWDUCEISNegative correlation with SWE (r = -0.505, P = 0.008); no correlation with (r = 0.001, P = 0.998)