Exploring influences and risk of bias of studies on return to sport and work after lateral ankle sprain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

doi:10.13105/wjma.v12.i1.87026

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 12, Issue 1

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (1671)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-8) series.

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

714

Figures (1-3)

128

Tables (1-8)

142

Sum=1052

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

105

Download

264

Sum=369

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

Download

131

Sum=206

Mar 18, 2024 (publication date) through Jul 3, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Meta-Analysis

ISSN

2308-3840

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Meta-Anal. Mar 18, 2024; 12(1): 87026
Published online Mar 18, 2024. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v12.i1.87026

Table 8 Time of return to work

Intervention type	Means d to RTW (± SD)	Pooled mean d to RTW (± SD)
Arthroscopic surgery	6.8 (± 2.1)[34]	6.8 (± 2.1)
Open surgery	8.1 (± 2.4)[34]	8.1 (± 2.4)
All surgery	6.8 (± 2.1)[34]; 8.1 (± 2.4)[34]	7.5 (± 0.7)
Functional treatment	6.3 (NR)[25]; 2.5 (NR)[253]; 7.7 (NR)[13]; 9.6 (NR)[13]; 6.9 (NR)[13]; 7.7 (NR)[13]; 4.3 (NR)[35]; 4.7 (NR)[35]; 9.1 (range 0-21)[38]; 5.3 (range: 0-26)[238]; 5.2 (± 4.9)[26]; 3.7 (± 3.5)[265]; 2.74 (NR)[249]	5.8 (± 2.2)
No treatment	5.8 (± 4.7)[265]; 8.57 (NR)[24]	7.2 (± 1.4)

NR: Not reported; RTW: Return to work; SD: Standard deviation.

Citation: Maria PA, Vuurberg G, Kerkhoffs GM. Exploring influences and risk of bias of studies on return to sport and work after lateral ankle sprain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2024; 12(1): 87026
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v12/i1/87026.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v12.i1.87026