Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Meta-Anal. Mar 18, 2024; 12(1): 87026
Published online Mar 18, 2024. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v12.i1.87026
Published online Mar 18, 2024. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v12.i1.87026
Table 8 Time of return to work
| Intervention type | Means d to RTW (± SD) | Pooled mean d to RTW (± SD) |
| Arthroscopic surgery | 6.8 (± 2.1)[34] | 6.8 (± 2.1) |
| Open surgery | 8.1 (± 2.4)[34] | 8.1 (± 2.4) |
| All surgery | 6.8 (± 2.1)[34]; 8.1 (± 2.4)[34] | 7.5 (± 0.7) |
| Functional treatment | 6.3 (NR)[25]; 2.5 (NR)[253]; 7.7 (NR)[13]; 9.6 (NR)[13]; 6.9 (NR)[13]; 7.7 (NR)[13]; 4.3 (NR)[35]; 4.7 (NR)[35]; 9.1 (range 0-21)[38]; 5.3 (range: 0-26)[238]; 5.2 (± 4.9)[26]; 3.7 (± 3.5)[265]; 2.74 (NR)[249] | 5.8 (± 2.2) |
| No treatment | 5.8 (± 4.7)[265]; 8.57 (NR)[24] | 7.2 (± 1.4) |
- Citation: Maria PA, Vuurberg G, Kerkhoffs GM. Exploring influences and risk of bias of studies on return to sport and work after lateral ankle sprain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2024; 12(1): 87026
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v12/i1/87026.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v12.i1.87026