Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Meta-Anal. Mar 18, 2024; 12(1): 87026
Published online Mar 18, 2024. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v12.i1.87026
Table 7 Outcomes return to work
Ref.
Intervention + patients (n)
Rate of RTW, n (%)
Time to RTW in mean d (± SD)
P value
Avci et al[25], 1998Soft cast tape (31)NR2.5 (NR)P < 0.001
Scotch plus tape (26)NR6.3 (NR)
Cooke et al[13], 2009Below knee cast (142)NR7.7 (NR)NR
Aircast (149)NR9.6 (NR)
Bledsoe brace (149)NR6.9 (NR)
Tubular bandage (144)NR7.7 (NR)
Eiff et al[35], 1994Early mobilization (40)10 d = 22: (54); 3 wk = 30 (75); 6 wk = 36 (97); 3 month = 40 (100); 6 month = 40 (100)4.3 (NR)10 d, P < 0.001
Immobilized (37)10 d = 4 (13); 3 wk = 29 (79); 6 wk = 36 (96); 3 month = 37 (100); 6 month = 37 (100)4.7 (NR)
Leanderson et al[38], 1995Air-Stirrup ankle brace (39)NR5.3 (range: 0-26)P < 0.05
Compression bandage (34)NR9.1 (range: 0-21)
Lee et al[42], 2020Isolated ankle stabilization with fibular periosteum augment (99)88 (88.9)NRNS
Isolated ankle stabilization without fibular periosteum augment (26)18 (69.2)NR
Melton et al[33], 2018Modified Broström (127)93 (73.2)NRNA
O’Connor et al[29], 2020Tubigrip (18)NR5.2 (± 4.9)NS
Elastoplast (20)NR3.7 (± 3.5)
No Support (16)NR5.8 (± 4.7)
Slatyer et al[24], 1997Piroxicam (184)1732.74 (NR)P < 0.001
Placebo (180)1678.57 (NR)
Wang et al[34], 2023Arthroscopic Broström (30)NR6.8 (± 2.1)P = 0.006
Open Broström (31)NR8.1 (± 2.4)