Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Meta-Anal. Nov 26, 2013; 1(3): 147-156
Published online Nov 26, 2013. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v1.i3.147
Published online Nov 26, 2013. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v1.i3.147
Table 2 Methylation of pooled genes for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
Wnt pathway | DNA damage repair pathway | Other pathways | SE (95%CI) | SP (95%CI) | DOR (95%CI) | AUC |
Wnt pathway | DNA damage repair pathway | Other pathways | 73% (0.71-0.75) | 92% (90%-93%) | 30.86 (22.33-42.66) | 0.929 |
Wnt pathway | - | - | 74% (70%-77%) | 93% (90%-95%) | 33.92 (17.73-64.90) | 0.932 |
- | DNA damage repair pathway | - | 42% (36%-47%) | 97% (94%-99%) | 12.87 (5.98-27.72) | 0.730 |
- | - | Other pathways | 57% (55%-60%) | 94% (93%-95%) | 20.93 (15.56-28.15) | 0.921 |
SFRP2 | - | - | 79% (75%-82%) | 93% (90%-96%) | 47.57 (20.08-112.72) | 0.957 |
- | MGMT | - | 47% (40%-53%) | 95% (90%-98%) | 11.67 (5.10-26.67) | 0.709 |
- | MLH | - | 28% (18%-39%) | 100% (95%-100%) | 23.68 (3.02-185.44) | 0.500 |
- | - | Vimentin | 48% (42%-54%) | 93% (90%-95%) | 14.95 (8.99-24.84) | 0.862 |
- | - | OSMR | 47% (40%-54%) | 95% (91%-98%) | 14.66 (5.06-42.47) | 0.225 |
- | - | P16 | 50% (42%-58%) | 98% (92%-100%) | 24.39 (7.26-81.96) | 0.975 |
SFRP2 | MGMT | - | 69% (66%-72%) | 94% (91%-96%) | 33.24 (16.76-65.93) | 0.946 |
SFRP2 | MLH | - | 72% (68%-75%) | 94% (92%-96%) | 43.03 (20.15-91.87) | 0.953 |
SFRP2 | MLH | Vimentin | 64% (61%-67%) | 94% (92%-95%) | 27.11 (16.48-44.61) | 0.934 |
SFRP2 | MLH | OSMR | 65% (62%-69%) | 95% (93%-96%) | 33.10 (17.12-63.98) | 0.951 |
SFRP2 | MLH | P16 | 68% (64%-71%) | 95% (93%-97%) | 38.86 (20.11-67.54) | 0.952 |
- Citation: Zhang H, Zhu YQ, Qi J, Wang QX, Cai SS, Zhu SY, Zhu XW, Wang XT. Accuracy of early detection of colorectal tumours using stool methylation markers: A meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2013; 1(3): 147-156
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v1/i3/147.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v1.i3.147