Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 26, 2021; 9(9): 2123-2135
Published online Mar 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i9.2123
Published online Mar 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i9.2123
Grading | Qualitative | Evidence |
Level I | Strong | Evidence obtained from multiple relevant high quality randomized controlled trials for effectiveness |
Level II | Moderate | Evidence obtained from at least one relevant high quality randomized controlled trial or multiple relevant moderate or low quality randomized controlled trials |
Level III | Fair | Evidence obtained from at least one relevant high quality nonrandomized trial or observational study with multiple moderate or low quality observational studies |
Level IV | Limited | Evidence obtained from multiple moderate or low quality relevant observational studies |
Level V | Consensus based | Opinion or consensus of large group of clinicians and/or scientists for effectiveness as well as to assess preventive measures, adverse consequences, effectiveness of other measures |
- Citation: Liu JF, Shen W, Huang D, Song T, Tao W, Liu Q, Huang YQ, Zhang XM, Xia LJ, Wu DS, Liu H, Chen FY, Liu TH, Peng BG, Liu YQ. Expert consensus of Chinese Association for the Study of Pain on the radiofrequency therapy technology in the Department of Pain. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(9): 2123-2135
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i9/2123.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i9.2123