Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 16, 2021; 9(5): 1026-1036
Published online Feb 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i5.1026
Table 2 Brief conclusions of pT2+ from the past published literature
YearSample sizeSurgical methodPSA level (ng/mL)Clinical TNM stagePathology Gleason groupBCR rate
Freedland et al[1]2003Retrospective, 214 men, SEARCH DatabaseRP (no mention of open RP or RARP)Mean: 10.5 ± 8.6, median: 8.0T1: 97 (46%); T2: 110 (53%); T3: 3 (1%)1: 105 (51%); 2 and 3: 89 (43%); 4 and 5: 14 (7%)6-yr BCR rate 50%
Leite et al[19]2014Retrospective, 58 menOpen RPN/MN/MN/MMean follow-up: 35.9 ± 23.1 mo; BCR rate: 31%
Hashimoto et al[12]2015Retrospective, 837 menRARP6.90, range: 3-47.4T1c: 634 (75.7%); T2a: 111 (13.3%); T2b: 46 (5.5%); T2c: 39 (4.7%); T3: 7 (0.8%)1: 65 (7.8%); 2: 377 (45%); 3: 230 (26.2%); 4 and 5: 165 (19.7%)5-yr BCR free-survival: 62.4%
Karl et al[13]2015Retrospective, 956 menRetropubic RP: 88%; Laparoscopic RP: 6%; RARP: 4%; Perineal RP: 3%< 4: 13%; 4-9.9: 65%; 10-19.9: 18%; ≥ 20: 4%N/M1: 39%; 2: 52%; 3: 7%; 4 and 5: 2%Mean follow-up: 48 mo; BCR rate: 25.4%