Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 6, 2021; 9(4): 784-791
Published online Feb 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i4.784
Published online Feb 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i4.784
Table 5 Anorectal pressure measurement before and after treatment
Items, mmHg | Control, n = 50 | Experiment, n = 50 | t value | P value | ||
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |||
Anal canal resting pressure | 63.25 ± 13.86 | 46.92 ± 13.43 | 63.27 ± 12.52 | 41.37 ± 11.58 | 2.213 | < 0.05 |
Maximum systolic pressure | 104.93 ± 32.18 | 122.71 ± 33.15 | 105.1 ± 31.93 | 127.62 ± 32.87 | -0.737 | < 0.05 |
Initial defecation threshold | 75.31 ± 24.42 | 58.89 ± 15.15 | 76.33 ± 25.06 | 53.28 ± 12.23 | 2.037 | < 0.05 |
- Citation: Zhao X, Meng J, Dai J, Yin ZT. Effect of biofeedback combined with high-quality nursing in treatment of functional constipation. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(4): 784-791
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i4/784.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i4.784