Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 26, 2021; 9(36): 11276-11284
Published online Dec 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i36.11276
Published online Dec 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i36.11276
Figure 5 Upper boundary frequency of /f/, /s/, and /sh/ sounds at blank, removable partial denture, saddle pontic-fixed dental prostheses, modified ridge lap pontic-fixed dental prostheses, S-fixed dental prostheses-1, and M-fixed dental prostheses-1 situation.
Data shown are the mean ± SD, with P value deriving from one-way ANOVA tests with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01. RPD: Removable partial denture; FDP: Fixed dental prostheses; S-FDP: Saddle pontic-fixed dental prostheses; M-FDP: Modified ridge lap pontic-fixed dental prostheses; S-FDP-1: 1 wk after wearing saddle pontic-fixed dental prostheses; M-FDP-1: 1 wk after wearing modified ridge lap pontic-fixed dental prostheses.
- Citation: Wan J, Cai H, Wang T, Chen JY. Influence of pontic design of anterior fixed dental prosthesis on speech: A clinical case study. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(36): 11276-11284
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i36/11276.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i36.11276