Correlation of periodontal inflamed surface area with glycemic status in controlled and uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus

Table 3 Bonferroni post hoc analysis of probing pocket depth, clinical attachment loss and periodontal inflamed surface area among the study groups

Dependent variable	Group	Group	Mean difference	SE	Significant	95% confidence interval
						Upper bound	Lower bound
Mean PPD	I	II	0.76778	0.1330	0.000	1.089	0.4463
		III	0.83550	0.1330	0.000	1.157	0.5140
	II	III	0.06772	0.1330	1.00	0.3892	0.2538
Mean CAL	I	II	0.93488	0.1618	0.000	1.326	0.5438
		III	1.08697	0.1618	0.000	1.478	0.6959
	II	III	0.15208	0.1618	1.00	0.5432	0.2390
Mean PISA	I	II	654.278	127.80	0.000	963.166	345.391
		III	677.836	127.80	0.000	986.723	368.948
	II	III	23.557	127.80	1.00	332.444	285.330

Group I: Well-controlled T2DM; Group II: Uncontrolled T2DM group without microvascular complications; Group III: Uncontrolled T2DM group with microvascular complications. There was no significant difference between uncontrolled T2DM without microvascular complications group and uncontrolled T2DM group with microvascular complications for mean probing pocket depth, clinical attachment loss, and periodontal inflamed surface area (P = 1.00). SE: Standard error; PPD: Probing pocket depth; CAL: Clinical attachment loss; PISA: Periodontal inflamed surface area; T2DM: Type 2 diabetes mellitus.